• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Response regrading jobs.

Well, considerably too harsh, but anyway.

Joshua, the hard truth here is that you're in a difficult situation. There are more people today who want to be print journalists than there are print journalist jobs, and that includes people who have done it for decades and are looking for another chance.

You might want to stay in electronic media. Print media is dying a not-so-slow death. Folks landing jobs as sports editor of a 10,000 daily are a lot more qualified now than they were in 1970 or 1980 or 2000, because there are more people going after fewer jobs.
 
I was a sports editor. If you just sent in clips -- or applied online with no clips -- I may or may not have responded. I might have 200 applicants.

If you sent me an email, I probably did respond.

If Sports Barf applied, I would happily respond and tell him to shove his resume up his cover letter.
 
Listen to this post.

Some of the responses on here are unfathomably rude and pointless.

I was a sports editor. If you just sent in clips -- or applied online with no clips -- I may or may not have responded. I might have 200 applicants.

If you sent me an email, I probably did respond.

If Sports Barf applied, I would happily respond and tell him to shove his resume up his cover letter.
 
I was a sports editor. If you just sent in clips -- or applied online with no clips -- I may or may not have responded. I might have 200 applicants.

If you sent me an email, I probably did respond.

When I was searching for my first job way back when, the paper that eventually hired me advertised the opening in Editor & Publisher (does that even exist anymore?) and was overwhelmed with responses. The sports editor narrowed it to me and one other candidate because people he knew and trusted recommended us. Every subsequent hire he made during my years there unfolded the same way -- after getting dozens of responses, he'd stick to what he knew. Something as simple as having good connections can cut through all the noise and make a difference. Even though many things about the business have changed, I'm not sure that aspect of the hiring process is really all that different.
 
My advice is to go into corporate communications and salve any sports writing itch by being a blogger or freelancer on the side. You'll make more money, work normal hours, and yet still get to exercise that sports muscle.
 
Most newspapers prefer not to hire snowflake millennial goobers who can't spell and think the world revolves around them. Get a clue, my paper would never give you a job
Snowflake? Judging someone on less than a 100 words is pretty harsh... Is it wrong for someone who's never went in this direction to try and understand how the process works? I am actually dyslexic, and yes spelling and grammar are very hard for me, but for my station I have written some high-level stories and columns with minimal editing. Thanks for everyone's constructive input.
 
Also, to answer your question Joshua, not responding has become the norm not just in this business, but a lot of other professions. That doesn't make it right. It's just the way it is. People have become a bit too lazy to practice civility.
 
Just a thought, but maybe comments like the ones on this thread are a contributing reason to why we're dying as an industry. We don't all need to be assholes to someone looking for a reason why he/she never heard back for a particular job.
Yeah, no shirt. It always cracks me up when people here take issue with how a person transcribes conversational thought. His questions and comments were far from unintelligible. He's not writing a forking cover letter, he's asking questions of people on a message board.
 
When I was searching for my first job way back when, the paper that eventually hired me advertised the opening in Editor & Publisher (does that even exist anymore?) and was overwhelmed with responses. The sports editor narrowed it to me and one other candidate because people he knew and trusted recommended us. Every subsequent hire he made during my years there unfolded the same way -- after getting dozens of responses, he'd stick to what he knew. Something as simple as having good connections can cut through all the noise and make a difference. Even though many things about the business have changed, I'm not sure that aspect of the hiring process is really all that different.
That makes a lot of sense too, it's pretty much how I got my job in radio.
 
Just a thought, but maybe comments like the ones on this thread are a contributing reason to why we're dying as an industry. We don't all need to be assholes to someone looking for a reason why he/she never heard back for a particular job.
Amen!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top