dooley_womack1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2003
- Messages
- 56,488
fork yeah!
Oh, wait...
Oh, wait...
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
dooley_womack1 said:fork yeah!
Oh, wait...
Lieslntx said:I will not, however, consider it a legitimate sport as long as the person in charge of it uses the words "fork" and "dickhead" publicly like White did/does. If a person speaks this way openly they will not be taken seriously by the masses. He should show some measure of professionalism if he ever wants to be taken seriously by non-fans. Talk to your fan base this way if that's what they like. But speak this way, and the majority of your non-fan base will never give two cents what you or your "sport" thinks, cares, or does.
Bruce_Shoebottom said:Lieslntx said:I will not, however, consider it a legitimate sport as long as the person in charge of it uses the words "fork" and "dickhead" publicly like White did/does. If a person speaks this way openly they will not be taken seriously by the masses. He should show some measure of professionalism if he ever wants to be taken seriously by non-fans. Talk to your fan base this way if that's what they like. But speak this way, and the majority of your non-fan base will never give two cents what you or your "sport" thinks, cares, or does.
So, you refuse to take an entire sport seriously because its spokesman isn't a Bettman-like corporate robot. OK then. I'd argue more journalists find White interesting and quotable specifically because he doesn't filter his thoughts or engage in the droning PR-speak you find everywhere else.
RickStain said:This actually does remind me of the soccer fans.
"MMA is not a real sport."
MMA fan response
"Why are MMA fans so defensive?"
Kid Presentable said:I can't believe people are still arguing that it's appropriate to completely ignore an event that drew 12,000 people. You don't have to go all-out, but you have to at least cover it in some sense.
Ben.Breiner said:Kid Presentable said:I can't believe people are still arguing that it's appropriate to completely ignore an event that drew 12,000 people. You don't have to go all-out, but you have to at least cover it in some sense.
Some would argue it's not appropriate to not have no full time staffers covering preps. That is the boat the Chronicle is in right now.
Inky_Wretch said:RickStain said:This actually does remind me of the soccer fans.
"MMA is not a real sport."
MMA fan response
"Why are MMA fans so defensive?"
Now we just need some trolls to suggest ways to improve MMA to make it appeal to more Americans. More goals ... errr, knockouts!
Britney Spears concerts draw 12,000 people. Some of you would point out that Tea Parties draw more than that and don't contribute anything to society. Just because a lot of people attend an event doesn't make it newsworthy.Kid Presentable said:I can't believe people are still arguing that it's appropriate to completely ignore an event that drew 12,000 people. You don't have to go all-out, but you have to at least cover it in some sense.
and they both are covered by the papers. Your point?hondo said:Britney Spears concerts draw 12,000 people. Some of you would point out that Tea Parties draw more than that and don't contribute anything to society. Just because a lot of people attend an event doesn't make it newsworthy.Kid Presentable said:I can't believe people are still arguing that it's appropriate to completely ignore an event that drew 12,000 people. You don't have to go all-out, but you have to at least cover it in some sense.