Flip Wilson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2004
- Messages
- 2,692
The Indians of Comanche High School in Comanche, Texas, where I lived for a couple of years, wonder what the fuss is about.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The sheer number of historical nicknames for Boston's two MLB franchises is wonderful. Pilgrims, Beaneaters, Americans, Outlaws, Rustlers, Bees, and I'm probably missing a few.
Same with Brooklyn, Bridegrooms, Robins, Suburbas, I think the Tip-Tops were the Federal League team.
I understand that merch sales are incredibly important. The name and mascot-logo has to sell, even if it's something so f'king stupid that it makes no sense. Anything that resonates to sell all the different caps-unis and isn't "offensive" to someone gets selected.
But I've never figured out why teams don't select an easy one like Cleveland Spiders (or, maybe, Rocks), with an updated logo, mascot, colors, all the things that fit into the minor-league mold to sell merch AND have a historical connection (that isn't "offensive" to someone).
Oakland moving to Vegas obviously wasn't going to pick the 51s for anything and probably won't have a throwback with that. Oakland changed 51s to Avaiators and now has a dumb logo that looks like a neon Clicker from The Last of Us. But at least the 51s was funny and a connection to the area.
I believe the main hangup on Spiders was that they would have had to pay the U. of Richmond an unspecified amount to waive their copyright.
And I suspect that some of the reasons for the ridiculous names that are littered around Minor League baseball (Yard Goats? Trash Pandas?) are probably similar. The days in which we could have multiple Giants or Cardinals out there, much less in the same market, are long gone both for copyright reasons and for outright branding.
Always misread that as Superbras growing up.
Headlines for Rocks or Spiders would've been great.
The Cleveland MLB team has the same name as a rollerball team, which sued when the name was announced. The standard is confusion in the marketplace.I don't really think the Cleveland franchise would have to pay Richmond anything unless their new colors and logo were glaringly similar (they might have to change team colors but that wouldn't seem too hard). I think there is a roller derby team or travel volleyball or something called the Cleveland Rocks, and obviously you'd have to come to some kind of agreement with Ian Hunter, but Drew Carey did it, so why not?