Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Back around 9/11, I covered a deadly crash, a bad fire, a memorial for a guy whose struggle against cancer I wrote about, and then 9/11 - I was grateful that the paper actually brought in a counselor and I checked in with her - there were times, dealing with a lot of death on the job, knocking on doors of grief-stricken families, times I asked an editor for someone else to cover a funeral because I was numb to death and my tank of empathy was empty - about a week after 9/11 I was at home, finally able to catch my breath, had a little cry about it all - and I was good. The important thing is to talk about stuff like this - acknowledge it. The military began having better results when they didn't have soldiers "self-report" PTSD anymore and just assumed everyone had it and gave them the tools and counseling so there would be no stigma to it.
But I am surprised a journalist who specializes in social media doesn't have a good filter (either personal, or an app) for crap. I don't answer the phone from numbers I don't recognize, I don't open e-mails from addresses I don't know or even care about comments from people who don't actually know me on social media. But I realize the younger generations live their lives on-line, and it is as much of who they are as they probably actually are.
She is a must-read for tech and social media reporting.Never heard of her
Well then, since I don't read about either of those things I guess I can move on.She is a must-read for tech and social media reporting.
She is a must-read for tech and social media reporting.