Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Excellent take. My addendum to that is I don't know the man but it is pretty apparent he is very very talented and very very lazy. Which is fine. He needs to park himself in Los Angeles or New York and write a daily column for somebody. He doesn't even have to go to games if he doesn't want. Just be like Royko was. An observer and a talented writer. He won't have to deal with people in this day and age. There are no copy editors anymore so this extremely talented person should just write, file the column and enjoy life doing whatever a lazy person does.
I think some people are jealous. Whitlock is one of the most talented columnists in sports journalism history in my opinion. He has mastered the artform of interesting reading. Say what you want about his tenure at the Undefeated ... please tell me you agree that at least he is an INCREDIBLE wordsmith?Whitlock is no Royko.
I think some people are jealous. Whitlock is one of the most talented columnists in sports journalism history in my opinion. He has mastered the artform of interesting reading. Say what you want about his tenure at the Undefeated ... please tell me you agree that at least he is an INCREDIBLE wordsmith?
No, he's not.
He's a good barstool philosopher. This is no small thing - plays, movies and TV shows have been written about such men - but he's not some blue collar warrior poet. He's perceptive about people, but in a way that ultimately runs dry on hope.
No, he's not.
He's a good barstool philosopher. This is no small thing - plays, movies and TV shows have been written about such men - but he's not some blue collar warrior poet. He's perceptive about people, but in a way that ultimately runs dry on hope.