Versatile said:I Should Coco said:Another factor not considered in the story: what percentage in a given field works a second job to get by?
Needless to say, journalists would rate highly in this dubious category.
And it affects what we cover, too -- on several recent occasions at my shop, breaking news didn't get covered because the skeleton crew of reporters, photogs and copy editors (who sometimes cover things in a pinch) were either working at their second job or buried in pages.
Not that anyone in management even noticed ...
I don't know any full-time journalists working second jobs, including a handful making less than $30,000. I wonder how many do.
We have like eight full-timers in our newsroom and only one works a second job. It's obviously all about cost of living. If you're married and he/she works full-time, there's obviously going to be less of a need to work a second job.
But for those papers that are still paying less than 24,000 a year to start for single, young reporters, I could see having to have a second job. There aren't many regular daily papers that are above 5,000 circ., paying that low in my area, but I'd certainly believe it in other areas.