• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NFL Week 1 thread -- Where we learn the meaning of Vão pássaros

No wind in Atlanta except rare occasions when the roof is open. Does have the third-highest elevation behind Denver and Glendale. (Kansas City is fourth, which I would not have guessed in at least two dozen tries.)

Outside of Denver the strongest possibility is the occasional Mexico City game.
 
Atlanta is at about 1,000 feet. Is that high enough to have an appreciable effect?

It does in baseball: Fulton County Stadium consistently had much higher power numbers than most of the otherwise mostly identical 60s multipurpose cookie cutter stadiums at lower altitudes.
 
It is far easier for me to be "in the moment" with just a radio call than if I am watching a televised game on mute. I don't begrudge anyone who does it the other way, but I have to have audio to truly capture my attention. The typical sports bar setup doesn't work if I'm trying to follow a game.
I agree; however, unless you were of the chosen who grew up listening to one of the golden trio of announcers in Knoxville, Athens or Tuscaloosa, I can understand why listening to radio calls doesn't have the same nostalgic allure.
 
I agree; however, unless you were of the chosen who grew up listening to one of the golden trio of announcers in Knoxville, Athens or Tuscaloosa, I can understand why listening to radio calls doesn't have the same nostalgic allured.
Agreed. But my point was more about how hard it is for me to get into a game that's on mute. I'm lucky to make it 60 seconds before whipping out my phone.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top