PCLoadLetter
Well-Known Member
Central Park Five.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wow. Not a good look for the SEC crowd. ... Gut-wrenching, actually.
![]()
The pre-2004 ACC crowd not doing much better.Wow. Not a good look for the SEC crowd. ... Gut-wrenching, actually.
![]()
Starting with women who have abortions and/or miscarriages. /crossthread /baronJust speculation, of course, but I have little doubt that a significant number of Americans would enthusiastically support the return of mob lynchings of accused/convicted criminals. Social media, in particular, has revealed an ugly lack of empathy for anyone who ever screwed up.
Wow. Not a good look for the SEC crowd. ... Gut-wrenching, actually.
![]()
I watched the segment and the story about the 15,000 people attending a lynching was just sickening. Not sure why they had that disclaimer about showing the pictures. I didn't think they needed to justify it at all. They should colorize them all and then rebroadcast the entire segment.
Btw, that lampoon segment was painfully unfunny.
Has he done such segments before? I mean, Oprah with the segment on lynching, that make sense. Wertheim on National Lampoon just seems like a whiff. I'm sure he's a very nice man, but it was obvious he wasn't getting much from the president of the club or the others bc he didn't have the personality to pull it off.Wertheim's fake laughter throughout was painful.
Has he done such segments before? I mean, Oprah with the segment on lynching, that make sense. Wertheim on National Lampoon just seems like a whiff. I'm sure he's a very nice man, but it was obvious he wasn't getting much from the president of the club or the others bc he didn't have the personality to pull it off.
Ya mean ya didn't think it was hysterical that the guy said "frankly" before every sentence?I got the feeling that "60 Minutes" went into the segment thinking that they were going to be able to strong-arm a bunch of college kids into yielding better access than they actually did.
I also think that the kind of hoity toities who populate the staff of a show like "60 Minutes" mis-calculated in thinking that 99.9 percent of Americans give a single fork about what happens behind the scenes at the "Harvard Lampoon."
Wouldn't surprise me if they also thought that they were going to get much better stuff about the diversity angle.