B
beefncheddar
Guest
ANOTHER spanking children thread?
http://limewoody.wordpress.com/files/2006/04/aw_jeez_not_this_shirt_again2.jpg
http://limewoody.wordpress.com/files/2006/04/aw_jeez_not_this_shirt_again2.jpg
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Junkie said:If you're referring to me, I wasn't beaten. I was spanked. I can't help it if you don't know the difference.Fenian_Bastard said:Gee, people who were beaten as children think it's a good idea.
Color me surprised.
I don't know what you received as a child, but for all the hate you spew, I have to believe it wasn't love.
And JR, the perp in this case is EXACTLY why it's not a big deal. That kid went to Tech expecting that kind of stuff. Well, now he got it. Play with fire, etc.
Fenian_Bastard said:Interesting attitude. Also interesting disinclination to answer why Knight never has to behave like a rational human being.
Back to the topic at hand.
If Knight got caught paying a kid out of his own pocket, I would argue for leniency because he has no recorded history of that kind of thing. If a couple of players didn't graduate, I wouldn't lump him with, say, HuggyBear because Knight's record on that score has been pretty damn good. In other words, history matters. Which is why Knight simply cannot put his hands on his players any more. Not because other coahces do, but because his history says that it will escalate into something ugly and untoward. He lost his right to do that with impunity about five incidents ago. It's his fault, nobody else's, and it's certainly not the fault of his players.
Buck said:This just in: ESPN's crew of basketball analysts are declaring this is a nonissue and a nonstory for the 18th consecutive hour.
Tune throughout the night for more coverage.
Fenian_Bastard said:Interesting attitude. Also interesting disinclination to answer why Knight never has to behave like a rational human being.
Back to the topic at hand.
If Knight got caught paying a kid out of his own pocket, I would argue for leniency because he has no recorded history of that kind of thing. If a couple of players didn't graduate, I wouldn't lump him with, say, HuggyBear because Knight's record on that score has been pretty damn good. In other words, history matters. Which is why Knight simply cannot put his hands on his players any more. Not because other coahces do, but because his history says that it will escalate into something ugly and untoward. He lost his right to do that with impunity about five incidents ago. It's his fault, nobody else's, and it's certainly not the fault of his players.
Pringle said:Vic Mackey said:When I was younger, I got the strap. A parent does that now, and here comes Children's Aid.
And rightfully so. No child deserves to be hit. Period.