• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

deck Whitman: Great thread starter or greatest thread starter?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, OK. I guess maybe it could've been. I don't know.

I just thought it was getting a little unnecessarily mean-spirited and distasteful, though.

Staunch support of child molesters is distasteful. This thread? heck, I'm guessing deck absolutely loves this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC
The amazing thing about this thread in my opinion is that it is 3.5 days old, and DW still hasn't commented in it. That is some amazing self restraint.
 
The amazing thing about this thread in my opinion is that it is 3.5 days old, and DW still hasn't commented in it. That is some amazing self restraint.
It's like an old-timey political convention, where the man of the hour sends the rabble to sing his praises while he keeps a respectful distance.
 
Staunch support of child molesters is distasteful. This thread? heck, I'm guessing deck absolutely loves this thread.

OK. I'm going to spell this out for you, since you apparently think apples and oranges are the same things.

I found this thread distasteful because I've never seen a thread that was literally about a poster -- a still-living, breathing and regular poster, who, frankly, contributes a lot around here, that seemed so mean-spirited and yes, distasteful, that was started for no apparent reason besides the opportunity to pick on, goad, insult or embarrass him.

That's a far different thing from whatever I think, or ever attempted to express, regarding a famous family, and this thread can hardly be compared to that one, which, thanks to me and some other people, was actually a decent discussion of an important topic that touches way beyond that famous family.

If deck "loves" this thread, well, then he's a lot more narcissistic than even anyone here imagines. And don't even try to argue that this thread was started because anybody thought DW would love it.
 
OK. I'm going to spell this out for you, since you apparently think apples and oranges are the same things.

I found this thread distasteful because I've never seen a thread that was literally about a poster -- a still-living, breathing and regular poster, who, frankly, contributes a lot around here, that seemed so mean-spirited and yes, distasteful, that was started for no apparent reason besides the opportunity to pick on, goad, insult or embarrass him.

That's a far different thing from whatever I think, or ever attempted to express, regarding a famous family, and this thread can hardly be compared to that one, which, thanks to me and some other people, was actually a decent discussion of an important topic that touches way beyond that famous family.

If deck "loves" this thread, well, then he's a lot more narcissistic than even anyone here imagines. And don't even try to argue that this thread was started because anybody thought DW would love it.

You spoke of distasteful things and I gave you an example. This thread is not distasteful at all and most of the comments about deck were clearly meant in fun.

I'm not so sure about that last bit. I imagine deck as being quite the narcissist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC
Geez, this thread is not about me, yet I am starting to feel the butthurt.
 
I misremembered, thought it was HOF poster. I'll go with great thread starter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top