I'm confused. Just read his report on the Auburn football coaching change in the Montgomery Advertiser.Already started. First story was Tuesday.
Anyone know what is going on?
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm confused. Just read his report on the Auburn football coaching change in the Montgomery Advertiser.Already started. First story was Tuesday.
I'm confused. Just read his report on the Auburn football coaching change in the Montgomery Advertiser.
Anyone know what is going on?
Upon further review, I think you're right. The Advertiser story has a shared byline with Auburn dateline. I didn't notice the other reporter's name on my initial read.Maybe had a pre-written story on the coaching change, like many obits are pre-written knowing it was coming?
When a local guy won the Cup and invited some of us to his "Day with the Cup" party we took a photo next to it that we've used in social media promotion…. Never felt slimey about that.
Local team won it and had a photo day for the media to being families and pose with it at the rink too. Those were kept private not for ethics but just as no one needs to see my kids.
Never in a zillion billion years would touch it beyond a finger helping read the names. Hoist it? What the fork
Ethics are for people who can afford to have them. Yes, I get it - not a good look in the "classic" sense. But we've all witnessed newspapars as institutions conduct their businesses in a way that is anything but ethical as circulation has dropped, cutting corners, dubious "alliances" - heck, selling ads on the front page. But some scrub reporter is the bad guy for enjoying the moment that has made all the BS, pay freezes, furloughs and more seem worth it?
I can remember being a part of a talk with a Denver Post editor when I was in college who said firmly and not very nicely, don't even think about applying until you have at least seven years of experience. That wasn't sports, just in general. Always stuck with me. Sort of as conceited. Sort of as, whoa, going to take a lot to get to a place like that!
I don't really remember the timing, but my college paper editor, who was the same year as me, worked there in a pretty decent beat within a few years. So she beat that, and she deserved it. (Edit: just looked at her LinkedIn, less than a year!)
Needless to say, whatever rule that editor was yapping about then didn't last long after that talk. Definitely doesn't apply now.
Kind of a stupid thing to say, unless he meant don't expect to land the job until you have 7 years experience. Applying and going to an interview is
good to experience.
Did nobody in the Denver market go to journalism school?