MeanGreenATO
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2011
- Messages
- 643
Pearlman had a great thread on this:
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The other cheers when their team gains 11 yards on third-and-15, is certain the refs cost them every game, wants someone to tell them their team is the greatest ever and is annoying as fork if you are in the same room with them when you're watching your team. And their the majority of fans out there when your team is actually good.
Ms. Madcow appears on network TV exactly one night per week more than Mr. Asshole does.I have three of these in my family and have to leave the room, if possible, when a game is on. Annoying as heck. They're never wrong, "everyone" hates the team including "every" announcer and media person, and the refs screw the team "all the time."
I know they don't go on the fanboi sites, though, because two of them are 75+ years old and one is in his 40s but doesn't give a flip about those sites (thankfully).
The golden-glad BuffaCheer TV anchor doesnt surprise me. Dress up blingy, "yay team" fangurrll with all her supporters who go apeshirt if anyone disses her, and climbs the market ladder to the job with FOX or ESPN. Similar process with the guys who fanboi on the team.
Is that terrible? Nah, it's the career path they want and chose. Is it journalism? Nope. But in today's skewed world where viewers slobber over Rachel Madcow or Tucker Asshole and can't or won't tell the difference between opinion and news, it hardly matters. To them it's just another shiny-faced TV person reporting on YayMyTeam!
Pearlman had a great thread on this:
Pearlman had a great thread on this:
He's a very good journalist/play-it-safe media commentator picking on some TV reporter in Colorado. He could call out ass-kissers who looked the other way for years on Mickelson, he could reference many journalists' embarrassing belief in Lance Armstrong, he could take on Bill Simmons or any number of people who write about the musical mediocrities of pop stars like Mozart just reappeared on the scene. He could name those names and really have a discussion, because of those people either get awfully defensive or slippery about critiques lobbed against them.
He picks a Colorado TV reporter upon whom to build his lecture.
He could name those names and really have a discussion, because some of those people either get awfully defensive or slippery about critiques lobbed against them.
He picks a Colorado TV reporter upon whom to build his lecture.