JR
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Messages
- 31,657
Your Humble Servant.Mayfly said:What does "YHS" mean when FOTF writes it? I have always wondered this.
He's the Fourth Earl of The Danforth.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your Humble Servant.Mayfly said:What does "YHS" mean when FOTF writes it? I have always wondered this.
Fenian_Bastard said:JR said:Mr. F of F
Shouldn't you be, like, working on your book?
T minus, what, five days and counting?
What's it to you, eh, Jiminy Cricket?
(Sorry. I have a book coming due, too, and I'm very grumpy about it.)
Simon_Cowbell said:Not that I have seen in your posts.Mighty_Wingman said:I also voted for him twice...do I get "stupid or lacking a conscience" amnesty?
Though, you can't be all bad with that sig.
Mighty_Wingman said:Simon_Cowbell said:Not that I have seen in your posts.Mighty_Wingman said:I also voted for him twice...do I get "stupid or lacking a conscience" amnesty?
Though, you can't be all bad with that sig.
The idea that anyone who doesn't agree with you politically must be an idiot (or a "criminal," if you're F_B) is an old one. But it's an especially pernicious one in a democracy, where at the very least a large plurality of your fellow citizens are going to disagree with you on the issues of the day.
And, since the Coulter thread has gotten jacked into a tax debate, here's as good a place as any to point out that being anti-elitism doesn't have to mean embracing ignorance.
There should have been about a quarter disagreeing with me on election day 2004 with regard to who to vote for. Not 48 percent.Mighty_Wingman said:Simon_Cowbell said:Not that I have seen in your posts.Mighty_Wingman said:I also voted for him twice...do I get "stupid or lacking a conscience" amnesty?
Though, you can't be all bad with that sig.
The idea that anyone who doesn't agree with you politically must be an idiot (or a "criminal," if you're F_B) is an old one. But it's an especially pernicious one in a democracy, where at the very least a large plurality of your fellow citizens are going to disagree with you on the issues of the day.
And, since the Coulter thread has gotten jacked into a tax debate, here's as good a place as any to point out that being anti-elitism doesn't have to mean embracing ignorance.
Fenian_Bastard said:Of course, not.
Mighty_Wingman said:You're moving the goalposts, Simon. What happened to "If you voted for Bush twice you are either a) stupid or b) without a conscience?"
And F_B, I'm hoping your response means you don't think I'm an idiot or a criminal. Here's hoping.
Mighty_Wingman said:Fenian_Bastard said:Of course, not.
Now that's funnier than almost any of the pictures you've posted.