• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Guidelines For Issuing Press Credentials To Bloggers

Joined
Mar 28, 2006
Messages
8,068
The Washington Capitals asked Eric McErlain (whose blog Off Wing Opinion is very respected in the blogging hockey community) to come up with guidelines for issuing press credentials to bloggers.

I'm posting this here in the hopes of avoid the "blogs" crap. Keep in mind that most pro teams are wrestling with this issue right now. Also keep in mind that some of you may turn to a blog in order to keep your hand in certain sports between jobs or to increase your industry profile.

Anyway - here is what Eric came up with:

Guidelines for Granting Press Credentials to
Bloggers and Other Online Media Representatives

Our organization, in an effort to better communicate with and inform our fans and sponsors, is committed to working with the emerging class of independent reporters and columnists who reach their audiences via blogs, podcasts, videoblogs and other online media. However, because these communications vehicles are so new, and the practitioners are not connected with established media organizations, some confusion exists as to how professional sports franchises can and should interact with them on a continuing basis.

The following is a list of guidelines that the team will use in order to decide how to issue press credentials to independent online media representatives:

* Individuals may apply for credentials on a game-by-game basis unless otherwise specified. Requests for credentials must be sent by e-mail or in writing to the Director of Media Relations. In addition, the team must have at least a three working day window to consider an application.

* Access is a privilege, not a right, and the organization reserves the right to revoke this privilege at any time. The organization also reserves the right to deny/revoke credentials to any outlet that publishes objectionable content.

* The organization prefers to work with online media outlets that have an established track record covering our team, our league and professional sports. As a general guideline, we would like to work with outlets that have been in continuous operation for at least 3-6 months. Please note, however, that we do have some flexibility in this area. For example, while a blog concentrating on a specific time-limited event like the NHL Draft or the Stanley Cup Playoffs couldn't be reasonably expected to meet the above guideline, an exception could easily be justified on the basis of subject matter.

* All applicants must submit traffic data from a third party (Sitemeter, Technorati, Feedburner, iTunes or an equivalent) in order to be considered. While the decision to grant access is not based solely on traffic/subscriber data, we do ask that applicants provide some degree of transparency into their operations in order for us to make a fair and timely decision on an application.

* Obtaining press credentials is an opportunity to meet and interact with players and team officials. It is not a free ticket to the game. While continued access to the arena is not directly contingent on producing coverage every time, due to space limitations, the team must take it into consideration when granting continued access. Following the game, please forward a link to your post/podcast/videoblog to the Director of Media Relations.

* Bloggers who are granted access to the press box and other areas inside the arena are expected to act professionally at all times. Those who do not observe the practices of professional decorum run the risk of being ejected from the arena, and barred from future access.

* The final decision on all applications for press credentials rests with the Director of Media Relations.

Eric is looking for serious input as this is not the final draft.

http://www.ericmcerlain.com/offwingopinion/archives/006447.php#006447
 
Well, the middlin'-sized paper where I'm working started live-blogging SEC games last year, when I was not here.

We got a credential to send out blogger to Thursday's Miss. State-South Carolina ESPN game with little fuss. The deal is, no play-by-play. Which would suck anyway.

Sunday's Ole Miss-Memphis game? No, sorry, no room at the Oxford Inn. We can "live" blog off the TV, I suppose.

Another brick in the wall of Fortress Orgeron? I dunno.
 
Ole Miss fans would probably rather read a blog from the Grove anyway.
 
* Access is a privilege, not a right, and the organization reserves the right to revoke this privilege at any time. The organization also reserves the right to deny/revoke credentials to any outlet that publishes objectionable content.

The second part of that would seem problematic for anyone attempting to cover a beat, unless "objectionable" was defined better.
 
FirstDownPirates said:
* Access is a privilege, not a right, and the organization reserves the right to revoke this privilege at any time. The organization also reserves the right to deny/revoke credentials to any outlet that publishes objectionable content.

The second part of that would seem problematic for anyone attempting to cover a beat, unless "objectionable" was defined better.

This particular criteria probably applies in all press boxes, but any team that went around abusing it would take too much crap if they barred a newspaper reporter over negative coverage. They probably really mean "libelous" but wouldn't want to limit themselves by inserting a legal term there.
 
3-day window to consider application? Not fair for anybody. Sometimes a trade is made, a big player is called up, a special circumstance. It should be one business day for all media.

I've never heard of those 3rd-party traffic monitors. I'm pretty sure Nielsen ranks. So I'd set a spot in the Nielsen rankings, and if they make the cut, they're in. I would also require that the site is a commercial venture - i.e. accepts legit ads from legit companies - not the Google stuff. Here's the bottom line: A blog can be "respected," but to credential, it must have hits.

Forget the line about e-mailing the P.R. guy. If the blog is big enough to receive a credential, P.R. guy can find it himself.

The point here is to give big, legit bloggers the exact same privileges as the mainstream media-- because they are the mainstream media now-- while restricting the guys doing it as a hobby. The answer is NOT to give the hobbyists some half-assed privileges.

Either you're in, and you get treated like everybody else, or you're not in.
 
Jersey_Guy said:
I don't like the idea you have to supply a link to the PR department. If they're interested, they can certainly find it themselves.

It's not like they'd expect the Washington Post beat writer to drop off a paper in the morning.

Yes.... they should supply a link.

Blogs are like fleas, newspapers more like dogs.
 
Supplying a link is reasonable.

I think for the most part, it's hard to argue with. I think using either Nielsen or Alexa is a good metric (although Sitemeter is OK, if you have a smaller site, not in the top 100K) — as is the requirement of a certain amount of time in service.

The PR staffs have to have some ways to delineate the professional sites from the teenagers.

I think it's a good first step and bodes well — if we see the same thing from other pro sports in the years to come.
 
Lots of different people get into regular season games anyway through various means. On two occasions in a MLB pressbox I sat next to a guy who spent the whole game posting on a message board for that team.
 
Forget the Nielsen ratings, etc....how about a copy of a pay stub? Money talks- or at least it certainly separates the hobbyists from the pros. If a BLOG! is someone's way of making a living, I've gotta think he/she has the chops to be able to handle a credential or a seat on press row. So show it via a paycheck.

I'm not being completely serious, but to me that's always been the bottom line with online media outside of the mainstream sites. Hobbyists -- though some do a damn good job with their sites -- are just that, so should they get access to something Joe Ticketbuyer wouldn't?
 
That's why I said the part about the advertisers.

Anybody with a good laser printer and a bank account can make up a pay stub.

But if half a million people read your website, and it's sponsored by McDonald's, now we're talking.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top