• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Let's try this again: Candidates and their qualifications...

Blushing said:
The American economy depends on injustice. Injustice is essential to its working. Imagine some lazy college student (choose whatever sex and race you want) whose alarm clock goes off and he/she wonders if it's all worth it. I'm not especially talented, gifted, smart or industrious, and I really don't want to work hard, and I just as soon lie here, he/she thinks, and so what's the use. Why bother because, after all, I'm not particularly deserving. If we all get what we deserve, well, I'm destined to be a telephone solicitor. On the other hand, with the world the way it is, he/she has an incentive and forces the old body to roll out of bed because, he/she thinks, I might be a columnist some day.

Interesting take. I thought the American economy depended on massive credit card debt, though.
 
Blushing said:
The American economy depends on injustice. Injustice is essential to its working. Imagine some lazy college student (choose whatever sex and race you want) whose alarm clock goes off and he/she wonders if it's all worth it. I'm not especially talented, gifted, smart or industrious, and I really don't want to work hard, and I just as soon lie here, he/she thinks, and so what's the use. Why bother because, after all, I'm not particularly deserving. If we all get what we deserve, well, I'm destined to be a telephone solicitor. On the other hand, with the world the way it is, he/she has an incentive and forces the old body to roll out of bed because, he/she thinks, I might be a columnist some day.

I got A LOT out of that!
 
Lee Jackson Beauregard said:
I happen to have been born with a tusk coming out of the middle of my forehead and I still cain't catch a break.

Or a decent hatmaker, I'll bet.
 
It's not always the "white male vs. everyone else" fight.

I know I've told this story on here before: I was a candidate for a job where the all-male department had been told to hire a woman. I was very qualified (and willing to work on the cheap), but the person who ended up with the job had zero experience in the field and was fresh out of college. Her only 'qualification': she was a smokin' hot former BCS school cheerleader.

It seemed as though the guys in the department felt if they had to hire a woman, they were going to make it worth their while. Obviously I wouldn't want to work at a place that hired based on appearance. But qualified women/minorities also get the shaft in relation to unqualified hires.
 
Cadet said:
It's not always the "white male vs. everyone else" fight.

I know I've told this story on here before: I was a candidate for a job where the all-male department had been told to hire a woman. I was very qualified (and willing to work on the cheap), but the person who ended up with the job had zero experience in the field and was fresh out of college. Her only 'qualification': she was a smokin' hot former BCS school cheerleader.

It seemed as though the guys in the department felt if they had to hire a woman, they were going to make it worth their while. Obviously I wouldn't want to work at a place that hired based on appearance. But qualified women/minorities also get the shaft in relation to unqualified hires.

To be fair, I bet they would have hired the smokin' hot former cheerleader even if she hadn't gone to a BCS school.
 
Ace said:
Cadet said:
It's not always the "white male vs. everyone else" fight.

I know I've told this story on here before: I was a candidate for a job where the all-male department had been told to hire a woman. I was very qualified (and willing to work on the cheap), but the person who ended up with the job had zero experience in the field and was fresh out of college. Her only 'qualification': she was a smokin' hot former BCS school cheerleader.

It seemed as though the guys in the department felt if they had to hire a woman, they were going to make it worth their while. Obviously I wouldn't want to work at a place that hired based on appearance. But qualified women/minorities also get the shaft in relation to unqualified hires.

To be fair, I bet they would have hired the smokin' hot former cheerleader even if she hadn't gone to a BCS school.

And this is not to say that I am not smokin' hot myself, just that I would always rather be evaluated on my merits than appearance. ;)
 
Cadet said:
Ace said:
Cadet said:
It's not always the "white male vs. everyone else" fight.

I know I've told this story on here before: I was a candidate for a job where the all-male department had been told to hire a woman. I was very qualified (and willing to work on the cheap), but the person who ended up with the job had zero experience in the field and was fresh out of college. Her only 'qualification': she was a smokin' hot former BCS school cheerleader.

It seemed as though the guys in the department felt if they had to hire a woman, they were going to make it worth their while. Obviously I wouldn't want to work at a place that hired based on appearance. But qualified women/minorities also get the shaft in relation to unqualified hires.

To be fair, I bet they would have hired the smokin' hot former cheerleader even if she hadn't gone to a BCS school.

And this is not to say that I am not smokin' hot myself, just that I would always rather be evaluated on my merits than appearance. ;)

Yeah, that schoolmarm outfit is a deal killer on interviews I bet.
 
Cadet said:
It's not always the "white male vs. everyone else" fight.

I know I've told this story on here before: I was a candidate for a job where the all-male department had been told to hire a woman. I was very qualified (and willing to work on the cheap), but the person who ended up with the job had zero experience in the field and was fresh out of college. Her only 'qualification': she was a smokin' hot former BCS school cheerleader.

It seemed as though the guys in the department felt if they had to hire a woman, they were going to make it worth their while. Obviously I wouldn't want to work at a place that hired based on appearance. But qualified women/minorities also get the shaft in relation to unqualified hires.

I hadn't read that one before, Cadet. That is truly disgraceful and unprofessional.

There are all kinds of bad hires. I just think there are some occasions when diversity-driven hires are among the bad ones.
 
As bad as it is to get passed over for whatever reason, it's even tougher to get downsized. And that happens in radio and tv at least as much as at newspapers. Reach a certain age and salary, and they can't wait to shove you out the door.

In a way, it sometimes allows the suits to double-dip: push out the oldster making more money, regardless of that person's gender or race, and then hire young, cheap and diverse.
 
3 bags said: "I am extremely bitter at those who made the decision and am currently doing everything I possibly can to thumb my nose in their faces."

that actually explains plenty, dude.

and, you still frequent a sportsjournalists web site ... wow.




exhale, exhale slowly.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top