• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

More stupid editor tricks

Dr. Howard

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
69
You would have to wonder if "putz" and "imbecile" are on this list.

http://blogs.vocalo.org/feder/2010/03/memo-puts-wgn-news-staffers-at-a-loss-for-words/17374
 
He sounds like a douche, and his insistence that people turn in their co-workers is a joke...

But the vast majority of the words on the banned list should never make their way into news copy.
 
PCLoadLetter said:
He sounds like a douche, and his insistence that people turn in their co-workers is a joke...

But the vast majority of the words on the banned list should never make their way into news copy.

What besides "alleged" would you suggest?

Sometimes it MUST be used in a crime/court story.
 
And, if you don't use "gunman (or lone gunman)" what do you say?

The man with a gun? Or the only man with a gun? Or the solitary man with a gun?

I need to stop reading this list; it's pissing me off.
 
Pete Incaviglia said:
PCLoadLetter said:
He sounds like a douche, and his insistence that people turn in their co-workers is a joke...

But the vast majority of the words on the banned list should never make their way into news copy.

What besides "alleged" would you suggest?

Sometimes it MUST be used in a crime/court story.

Not really, no. The man who police say killed Buckwheat" is better than "Buckwheat's alleged killer." NO ONE says "alleged" in everyday conversation. I'm not saying I never use it in copy, but I try to avoid it.

Keep in mind, these rules are for broadcast, not print. Print needs to be clear, but not necessarily conversational.
 
Pete Incaviglia said:
And, if you don't use "gunman (or lone gunman)" what do you say?

The man with a gun? Or the only man with a gun? Or the solitary man with a gun?

I need to stop reading this list; it's pissing me off.

Gunman is one of the few I have no problem with.
 
PCLoadLetter said:
Pete Incaviglia said:
PCLoadLetter said:
He sounds like a douche, and his insistence that people turn in their co-workers is a joke...

But the vast majority of the words on the banned list should never make their way into news copy.

What besides "alleged" would you suggest?

Sometimes it MUST be used in a crime/court story.

Not really, no. The man who police say killed Buckwheat" is better than "Buckwheat's alleged killer." NO ONE says "alleged" in everyday conversation. I'm not saying I never use it in copy, but I try to avoid it.

Keep in mind, these rules are for broadcast, not print. Print needs to be clear, but not necessarily conversational.

But if you get 30 seconds for a story, "alleged" takes a lot less time than "the man police say."
 
imjustagirl said:
PCLoadLetter said:
Pete Incaviglia said:
PCLoadLetter said:
He sounds like a douche, and his insistence that people turn in their co-workers is a joke...

But the vast majority of the words on the banned list should never make their way into news copy.

What besides "alleged" would you suggest?

Sometimes it MUST be used in a crime/court story.

Not really, no. The man who police say killed Buckwheat" is better than "Buckwheat's alleged killer." NO ONE says "alleged" in everyday conversation. I'm not saying I never use it in copy, but I try to avoid it.

Keep in mind, these rules are for broadcast, not print. Print needs to be clear, but not necessarily conversational.

But if you get 30 seconds for a story, "alleged" takes a lot less time than "the man police say."

Not enough to go with "alleged." I generally prefer "accused" to "alleged," just to be more conversational.

The word gets abused like crazy, and doesn't provide nearly the legal protection people think it does. My biggest alleged peeve in copy: "Witnesses say the man allegedly pulled out a gun..." "Police say he allegedly shot his neighbor..." Ugh. No, they say he shot his neighbor.
 
PCLoadLetter said:
imjustagirl said:
PCLoadLetter said:
Pete Incaviglia said:
PCLoadLetter said:
He sounds like a douche, and his insistence that people turn in their co-workers is a joke...

But the vast majority of the words on the banned list should never make their way into news copy.

What besides "alleged" would you suggest?

Sometimes it MUST be used in a crime/court story.

Not really, no. The man who police say killed Buckwheat" is better than "Buckwheat's alleged killer." NO ONE says "alleged" in everyday conversation. I'm not saying I never use it in copy, but I try to avoid it.

Keep in mind, these rules are for broadcast, not print. Print needs to be clear, but not necessarily conversational.

But if you get 30 seconds for a story, "alleged" takes a lot less time than "the man police say."

Not enough to go with "alleged." I generally prefer "accused" to "alleged," just to be more conversational.

The word gets abused like crazy, and doesn't provide nearly the legal protection people think it does. My biggest alleged peeve in copy: "Witnesses say the man allegedly pulled out a gun..." "Police say he allegedly shot his neighbor..." Ugh. No, they say he shot his neighbor.

Um, try Police allege he shot his neighbor.

Or, witnesses allege he pulled a gun.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top