PCLoadLetter
Well-Known Member
Pete Incaviglia said:PCLoadLetter said:imjustagirl said:PCLoadLetter said:Pete Incaviglia said:PCLoadLetter said:He sounds like a douche, and his insistence that people turn in their co-workers is a joke...
But the vast majority of the words on the banned list should never make their way into news copy.
What besides "alleged" would you suggest?
Sometimes it MUST be used in a crime/court story.
Not really, no. The man who police say killed Buckwheat" is better than "Buckwheat's alleged killer." NO ONE says "alleged" in everyday conversation. I'm not saying I never use it in copy, but I try to avoid it.
Keep in mind, these rules are for broadcast, not print. Print needs to be clear, but not necessarily conversational.
But if you get 30 seconds for a story, "alleged" takes a lot less time than "the man police say."
Not enough to go with "alleged." I generally prefer "accused" to "alleged," just to be more conversational.
The word gets abused like crazy, and doesn't provide nearly the legal protection people think it does. My biggest alleged peeve in copy: "Witnesses say the man allegedly pulled out a gun..." "Police say he allegedly shot his neighbor..." Ugh. No, they say he shot his neighbor.
Um, try Police allege he shot his neighbor.
Yes, except that no one outside of a news story ever uses the word "allege."