waterytart
Well-Known Member
I'll stipulate that winning Daytona is not a reliable predictor of driver skills, but neither is it a crapshoot. There have been plenty of years where there were dominant teams at plate races.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Michael_ Gee said:Why race if you don't have to?
Azrael said:It makes you immortal but bears no relation to your skill?
Some pretty selective Plate Age reasoning being applied here, whether we're talking about Dale Earnhardt or Michael Waltrip or Trevor Bayne.
Shoeless Joe said:Again, my point. Winning Daytona is a crap shoot. It does not reflect your ability. If Danica wins, that means she would have the same number of Daytona 500 wins as David Pearson, Dale Earnhardt, A.J. Foyt and Mario Andretti. I'm pretty sure she isn't in any conversation about those immortals.
Knighthawk said:Shoeless Joe said:Again, my point. Winning Daytona is a crap shoot. It does not reflect your ability. If Danica wins, that means she would have the same number of Daytona 500 wins as David Pearson, Dale Earnhardt, A.J. Foyt and Mario Andretti. I'm pretty sure she isn't in any conversation about those immortals.
She'd also have more Daytona 500 victories than Michael Schumacher and Juan Manuel Fangio, which is just as relevant to the discussion as the number won by Foyt and Andretti.
Versatile said:Foyt raced in 28 Daytona 500s.
Easy driving? You did mean to use the blue font for that, right?Versatile said:Nice attempt to cover your ass, but Daytona is an important part of A.J. Foyt's legacy. The same is true for Mario Andretti. Their wins there validated them to NASCAR fans who would be happy to tell you Formula One is fine if you like fast cars and easy driving.