bumpy mcgee
Well-Known Member
http://www.theonion.com/video/soccer-officially-announces-it-is-gay,17603/
Just the messenger
Just the messenger
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
deskslave said:So, just to clarify, a 1-0 baseball game that features no hits for the first six-plus innings and only four hits total is really, really exciting. But a 1-0 soccer game is really, really boring. Is that about right?
YankeeFan said:deskslave said:So, just to clarify, a 1-0 baseball game that features no hits for the first six-plus innings and only four hits total is really, really exciting. But a 1-0 soccer game is really, really boring. Is that about right?
Look, I love baseball, and I like soccer just fine.
But I understand the criticisms of baseball. One of them, especially from people who didn't grow up playing or watching it, is that it's boring.
I do.Stitch said:I wonder how many die-hard NHL fans want to bring back ties.
kingcreole said:deskslave said:So, just to clarify, a 1-0 baseball game that features no hits for the first six-plus innings and only four hits total is really, really exciting. But a 1-0 soccer game is really, really boring. Is that about right?
I personally love 1-0 baseball games. It's those 4-hour, 7-5 games where there are two mound visits every inning for the 6-9 innings (ie, every Yankee-Red Sox game).
A couple weeks ago, I went to a Royals-Tigers game. 1-0 after 7 innings. Took 1:30 to play. Six runs total in the last two innings extended the game another hour, but still. No excuse any baseball game should last more than 3 hours.
Smallpotatoes said:kingcreole said:deskslave said:So, just to clarify, a 1-0 baseball game that features no hits for the first six-plus innings and only four hits total is really, really exciting. But a 1-0 soccer game is really, really boring. Is that about right?
I personally love 1-0 baseball games. It's those 4-hour, 7-5 games where there are two mound visits every inning for the 6-9 innings (ie, every Yankee-Red Sox game).
A couple weeks ago, I went to a Royals-Tigers game. 1-0 after 7 innings. Took 1:30 to play. Six runs total in the last two innings extended the game another hour, but still. No excuse any baseball game should last more than 3 hours.
Why are Yankees/Red Sox games like that anyway? Do the networks need more breaks for ads? Is it because the game for some reason needs to be managed as if it's a playoff game?
JC said:I think you are all correct, soccer should change it's rules to appease Americans. If Americans don't like the game it can't possibly be any good. The rest of the world be damned let's change the sport to make Americans happy.
outofplace said:JC said:I think you are all correct, soccer should change it's rules to appease Americans. If Americans don't like the game it can't possibly be any good. The rest of the world be damned let's change the sport to make Americans happy.
![]()
Piotr Rasputin said:outofplace said:JC said:I think you are all correct, soccer should change it's rules to appease Americans. If Americans don't like the game it can't possibly be any good. The rest of the world be damned let's change the sport to make Americans happy.
![]()
With all due respect, OOP:
That's a load of crap. Much of this thread, much of the criticism of soccer, much of the "coverage" by the old-line columnists, all revolves around how "strange" the rules for soccer are. In MLS' early days, they thought they qwould need to change the rules just to appease American fans. They soon realized that those people won't watch anyway, even though they sure like to pish about the game.
Why are there ties?
Why can't they use their hands?
Why?!?!?
You acting like this is a "strawman" is willfully ignorant.