Slacker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2017
- Messages
- 10,599
Hard to believe, but incredibly good fortune.No deaths, allegedly? Wow.
Another look:

Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hard to believe, but incredibly good fortune.No deaths, allegedly? Wow.
Anyone here from Pittsburgh who knows about where this bridge is?
At least in Rhode Island when I was there, they knew what condition the bridges were in - bad. But it's hard to get approval for the money because it's boring - vs. dumping a bunch of money on pro sports funding - and once the project is approved, you're then dealing with people complaining about what an annoyance it is for everyone involved. Of course, the other elephant in the room for all construction projects is that they often go to lowest bidder, sometimes by law, when it's often better to just bite the bullet and pay for better workers and materials in the first place.My clients build these things and they are over-engineered to the hilt typically. However based on age, there is regular maintenance and inspections required (just like the Miami condo collapse). Thankfully no one was seriously hurt. Questions for me are Who was doing the maintenance? Who was doing the inspections? Were they at the corner bar throwing down whiskeys instead? This should never happen, ever.
Low bidder doesn't necessarily mean its worse. On public works projects, there are inspectors all over the place all day, every day, especially on concrete structures like bridges, testing reinforcing steel, testing concrete materials, testing the concrete strengths after pours. In 31 yrs in the Bay Area, I've never been involved in a public works project that had a catastrophic event. Low bidder wins, but low bid or middle bidder, the scrutiny is going to be the same.At least in Rhode Island when I was there, they knew what condition the bridges were in - bad. But it's hard to get approval for the money because it's boring - vs. dumping a bunch of money on pro sports funding - and once the project is approved, you're then dealing with people complaining about what an annoyance it is for everyone involved. Of course, the other elephant in the room for all construction projects is that they often go to lowest bidder, sometimes by law, when it's often better to just bite the bullet and pay for better workers and materials in the first place.
Any local Republican congressmen who voted against the infrastructure bill will sure be there when the repaired bridge opens, bragging about how they brought home the bacon.
Retiring GOP senator Toomey voted against it. WTF did he have to lose by voting for it?