TheSportsPredictor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2004
- Messages
- 31,804
You bring up a good point.
A VERY good point.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You bring up a good point.
Just when you thought you couldn't hate him anymore.
The juxtaposition of McAfee earlier in the show talking about taking his young daughter to Disney and then doing to a young woman was a chef's kiss by the writer.
I liked McAfee when he was playing for the Colts. Never understood the appeal of him as a media personality.
I liked McAfee when he was playing for the Colts. Never understood the appeal of him as a media personality.
The article you linked is really well done, but it annoyed me that they never addressed the glaring problem her defamation claim will have. As the reporter mentioned, McAfee never mentioned her by name. I went and watched the segment (it was gross and Schefter definitely had a look of why the F are you talking about this) because my brain was running through the identification problem. In other reporting I'd seen a claim that he'd put her picture up, which is why I went to the source. He did not. And his comments about who was involved are vague enough, that I don't think she actually has a claim. The closest he comes to identifying her is by saying her sorority name, but unless it's a really small sorority, that's probably not enough.
Absolutely, which is why I said it was a really well done article. It just created a big question without answering it for at least one reader (me), and though my journalism days are way behind me now, that's something I was taught to try to avoid.I think the story is more about McAfee's idiocy hurting someone than it is on whether or not her lawsuit has much of a chance of succeeding.
You have a good point. I'm just wondering if getting deeper into it would distract from the narrative.Absolutely, which is why I said it was a really well done article. It just created a big question without answering it for at least one reader (me), and though my journalism days are way behind me now, that's something I was taught to try to avoid.
If you pick up the phone and Katie Strang is on the line, you're forked. And, to quote Whoopi Goldberg back in the day, not in the nice way.The juxtaposition of McAfee earlier in the show talking about taking his young daughter to Disney and then doing to a young woman was a chef's kiss by the writer.