Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
shockey said:not to keep the threadjack going on forever, BUT...
maggie g. is NOT a good-looking woman. a fine actress, but certainly NOT eye candy.![]()
![]()
![]()
Freelance Hack said:shockey said:not to keep the threadjack going on forever, BUT...
maggie g. is NOT a good-looking woman. a fine actress, but certainly NOT eye candy.![]()
![]()
![]()
You mean this doesn't do it for you?
![]()
Freelance Hack said:Lugnuts said:I would say that she didn't look that great to begin with....
![]()
But I really don't want Fenian's head to explode.
Maggie's preggers?
Lugnuts said:If your point is that it enhances flaws, couldn't it also be argued it enhances assets?
![]()
Lugnuts said:You posted a picture of a woman who isn't known for her thighs-- pregnant-- with... not exactly great-looking thighs.
imjustagirl said:The first one ifilus posted of whoever has bad thighs was a red x on my computer.
The second one is too small but looks like Christina Aguilera. But she's not preggers.
I'm confused.