• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Telander raises pimp hand

I thought Telander should not have responded. The Trib has no credibility in saying that another paper is being homerish. None at all.
 
Damn... I enjoyed reading that... went over the edge a couple times, but was a fun column
 
Always like Telander, enjoyed this one too. Morrissey wrote one note too many in that midweek notes column. The Tribune/Cubs thing is just so dirty, anyone over there taking ethics shots has to expect rapid fire 10x worse in return.
 
playthrough said:
Always like Telander, enjoyed this one too. Morrissey wrote one note too many in that midweek notes column. The Tribune/Cubs thing is just so dirty, anyone over there taking ethics shots has to expect rapid fire 10x worse in return.

I can see that. I think Telander explained what they did too much. Should have just gone broadside with the Cubs from the get-go.
 
You know what we media members should do? Write more about one another. Because clearly, people give a fork.
 
We have less access than ever to the players and coaches we cover, and we have more access to the fans (message boards, e-mail) and each other (read everyone online) than ever. Not saying it's a good thing, but in that kind of world, you're going to read more about fans and more about the media than you ever did.
 
Double Down, I would normally agree with you. But I think in a handful of the great two-paper towns like Chicago, there is still some interest in a good ol' media squabble. People surely have a reason why they subscribe to the Trib and not the S-T, or vice versa, and maybe it's because of the sports coverage. If that's my reason, I probably get a kick out of "my columnist" taking some shots at the other guy.

It's an amusing middle-of-the-week debate. Not like it's going to take up precious Monday morning space. Pretty harmless (but entertaining) to me.
 
I'm with DD on this one....why is a stupid pissing contest between two papers newsworthy?
A lot of you come on here bemoaning the public's negative perception of us. How does this kind of crap improve that at all?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top