• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Telander raises pimp hand

RokSki said:
Double Down said:
You know what we media members should do? Write more about one another. Because clearly, people give a fork.

Totally agree, although I'm almost certain you're being sarcastic. People eat this stuff up. What people don't care about is the spread in the press box, etc. But they love the person - to - person dynamics stuff, or organization - to - organization stuff. Because it's stuff they don't know anything about, and it makes Joe Sixpack think that all the 'bigwigs' have the same issues with each other that he does with his neighbor. I'm not saying that it's the most worthwhile and highbrow stuff to write about, but it definitely gets a reaction.

Actually, what they think is that we're self-important blowhards who think they care more about what journalists do than they really do.

You know, maybe journalists will never be the most-loved profession out there. But dammit, we really could help ourselves once in a while rather than embrace the disconnect.
 
RokSki said:
Double Down said:
You know what we media members should do? Write more about one another. Because clearly, people give a fork.

Totally agree, although I'm almost certain you're being sarcastic. People eat this stuff up. What people don't care about is the spread in the press box, etc. But they love the person - to - person dynamics stuff, or organization - to - organization stuff. Because it's stuff they don't know anything about, and it makes Joe Sixpack think that all the 'bigwigs' have the same issues with each other that he does with his neighbor. I'm not saying that it's the most worthwhile and highbrow stuff to write about, but it definitely gets a reaction.

No, it really doesn't.

I think a lot of columnists like to think that people give a shirt about them, their problems, and the inside baseball of our industry, because it makes them feel more important.

It's a misguided belief that it justifies their existence, as if writing about the teams and sports stories fans really care about doesn't justify it enough.

Save the sniping and self-important stuff for a blog.
 
Bubbler said:
RokSki said:
Double Down said:
You know what we media members should do? Write more about one another. Because clearly, people give a fork.

Totally agree, although I'm almost certain you're being sarcastic. People eat this stuff up. What people don't care about is the spread in the press box, etc. But they love the person - to - person dynamics stuff, or organization - to - organization stuff. Because it's stuff they don't know anything about, and it makes Joe Sixpack think that all the 'bigwigs' have the same issues with each other that he does with his neighbor. I'm not saying that it's the most worthwhile and highbrow stuff to write about, but it definitely gets a reaction.

No, it really doesn't.

I think a lot of columnists like to think that people give a shirt about them, their problems, and the inside baseball of our industry, because it makes them feel more important.

It's a misguided belief that it justifies their existence, as if writing about the teams and sports stories fans really care about doesn't justify it enough.

Save the sniping and self-important stuff for a blog.
Do you know that people dislike this stuff? Any proof at all? I'm just curious. Because I think people like this stuff enough. I don't think people buy a paper to read media quarrels, or media-player quarrels, but i've had people ask me about them. i don't know if this column was particularly newsworthy, but i don't think the inner workings of the media is an anathema to readers.
 
Cousin Jeffrey said:
Do you know that people dislike this stuff? Any proof at all? I'm just curious. Because I think people like this stuff enough. I don't think people buy a paper to read media quarrels, or media-player quarrels, but i've had people ask me about them. i don't know if this column was particularly newsworthy, but i don't think the inner workings of the media is an anathema to readers.

Jeffrey, people ask you about them because you're in the business. If you were an architect, they would ask you about the dynamics of dealing with other architects.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top