publicenemy
Member
"Working through a source within the UT athletic department over a course of several weeks, Hooker was able to arrange an exclusive interview with Johnson."
clearly, someone in the athletic department thought so much of the SID access rule that he/she helped hooker set this up. sports information departments/media relations departments protect their athletes and coaches like they are holding state secrets. does phil fulmer have the launch code briefcase? no wonder UT has rules like that.
this is just another example of the business of college (and pro) sports getting so out of hand that the schools/franchises see themselves as far more important than they actually are. i vigorously fight the notion that sports departments are "toy departments", but we do cover games. we just try to bring solid journalistic practices to our coverage.
i think the reporter should be commended for doing what he did to get the story. whether he asked all the right questions or put all the right info in the story is certainly debatable. if he kept pestering the player for an interview and kept getting turned down, that's one thing. but there's no indication that happened. he worked a source in the athletic department for some days and was finally rewarded with an exclusive interview. the fact that some on here consider the story insignificant is irrelevant. if it had broken important news, we'd be lauding him for getting around the university stonewall to serve the readers. i don't see how this can be any different.
clearly, someone in the athletic department thought so much of the SID access rule that he/she helped hooker set this up. sports information departments/media relations departments protect their athletes and coaches like they are holding state secrets. does phil fulmer have the launch code briefcase? no wonder UT has rules like that.
this is just another example of the business of college (and pro) sports getting so out of hand that the schools/franchises see themselves as far more important than they actually are. i vigorously fight the notion that sports departments are "toy departments", but we do cover games. we just try to bring solid journalistic practices to our coverage.
i think the reporter should be commended for doing what he did to get the story. whether he asked all the right questions or put all the right info in the story is certainly debatable. if he kept pestering the player for an interview and kept getting turned down, that's one thing. but there's no indication that happened. he worked a source in the athletic department for some days and was finally rewarded with an exclusive interview. the fact that some on here consider the story insignificant is irrelevant. if it had broken important news, we'd be lauding him for getting around the university stonewall to serve the readers. i don't see how this can be any different.