• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The SJ.com Style Guide, version 3.0

I didn't see a single reference to JDV in that list, and that is a goddamn travesty.

I demand entries be made at least for his greatest contributions - "Provably. Demonstrably." and "SCOREBOARD."

Also, I think deck deserves an additional nod for "[blank]: HOF?" The threads themselves are interesting and it is often a good inside joke on other threads.

A travesty, or a travshamockery?
 
Also, does, "Bingo!" deserve an inclusion, defined as the reaction when OOP rolls out one of his trademarked phrases? ("Finally admitted"; "Reading comprehension problems"; "Run away and hide"; "Your dishonesty," etc.)

"Move the goalposts"

Finally admitted is clearly appropriate in this case. YankeeFan has been ducking that one for days, then he finally acknowledged that he was wrong on a completely different thread.

Of course, once again you are here to defend the coward and clean up another one of his messes. I'm starting to worry about you.

More bingo words. Amazing that on a joke thread you can't take a joke.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top