• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Think west, young (and old) men (and women)

If anyone doesn't know who Otis Chandler is, Google him and read about how he drove the L.A. Times to greatness, then watched it fall all around him after he left.

Chandler was probably the last Rock God of Journalism. And a damn good man at that.

He would shirt his pants over how the Chicago Tribune is handling the Times, and maybe that's what finally killed him off. A fascinating guy, though. Check out Otis Chandler, then ask your boss to define integrity as he/she sees it, and then go compare your notes.
 
Heywood Jablome said:
If anyone doesn't know who Otis Chandler is, Google him and read about how he drove the L.A. Times to greatness, then watched it fall all around him after he left.

Chandler was probably the last Rock God of Journalism. And a damn good man at that.

He would shirt his pants over how the Chicago Tribune is handling the Times, and maybe that's what finally killed him off. A fascinating guy, though. Check out Otis Chandler, then ask your boss to define integrity as he/she sees it, and then go compare your notes.

Agreed.
 
Just finished reading a biography of Otis Chandler called "Privileged Son." The last few chapters about the Times after he left were nauseating. A beacon of journalistic integrity laid low by family infighting and greed.
 
Claude Badley said:
Just finished reading a biography of Otis Chandler called "Privileged Son." The last few chapters about the Times after he left were nauseating. A beacon of journalistic integrity laid low by family infighting and greed.

Yeah, I read that, too...I had more personal interest, but still thought it was a very good read.
 
Gold said:
Maybe the theory is that the LA Times lacks relativity to its readers

Very well done.

So was "Privileged Son," although it kind of gave short-shrift to Norman Chandler. As far as looking into what made the paper great and getting into Otis's head, a great read.
 
In an effort to be reciprocal, the New York Times is starting a Hollywood Project.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top