• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

TJ Simers on changes in Los Angeles Times sports section going into effect Monday

I certainly understand the drive and desire to present the news where readers younger than 70 are.

Unfortunately, our industry still hasn't figured out to reach those folks with advertising on websites, Facebook, etc.

As I and others have said many times, newspapers would dump the print edition in a heartbeat if it penciled out financially, because it's such a labor intensive, expensive and time consuming process.

Long-term advertising contracts are the only thing keeping the print edition alive in a lot of markets.

As a person in a high place at a newspaper company told me a few years ago: "Let's just say that when a press breaks, we aren't going to fix it."
 
My son the new homeowner bought a grill, a charcoal Weber. He got a fire starting chimney and yesterday he had his first cookout. Said it went fine but he had a hard time finding paper to put in the bottom on the chimney because "we don't have any newspaper in the house." He lives in Brooklyn so I told him to go out and buy a Sunday Times this weekend. He and his wife are like Target A for most of the advertisers on earth, working couple with good jobs, new child, new home, etc. And he hasn't bought a print paper since the Red Sox won the 2004 Series when he was in college.
 
Major dailies like the DMN and FWST have been doing this for years now. Writing basically pre-written columns/features and inserting the final score of the game as just a chef's kiss.

Having intimate knowledge of one of those shops, it was a successful strategy, even when you had enough time to write a traditional gamer. A column/feature/insider based off a game has a longer tail than a traditional gamer.
 
Simers illustrates exactly why newspapers struggled to catch up to the times. In 2023, absolutely no one should be waking up the next morning looking for a gamer.
Nope, won't go there. And it may be a function of my age, but no.

Allowed, the gamer must change with the times -- less play-by-play, more telling why or how what happened, happened. But a well-crafted gamer is still a delight.

And it's not sticking the final score into the second graf of a feature.
 
My son the new homeowner bought a grill, a charcoal Weber. He got a fire starting chimney and yesterday he had his first cookout. Said it went fine but he had a hard time finding paper to put in the bottom on the chimney because "we don't have any newspaper in the house." He lives in Brooklyn so I told him to go out and buy a Sunday Times this weekend. He and his wife are like Target A for most of the advertisers on earth, working couple with good jobs, new child, new home, etc. And he hasn't bought a print paper since the Red Sox won the 2004 Series when he was in college.
No. He needs these.

1bff76bca0acaea688626952abbe361c.jpg
 
Simers can be…Simers, but a magazine-style sports front, every day, will be exhausting.
 
Simers, believing he was entitled to be paid $250,000 a year to write a column three times a week until the day that he died, sued for millions of dollars.

Now you can see why the Times was trying desperately to get other voices in the paper.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top