I guess I'd be surprised if the first place where girls HS sports suffers most is in southern rural Republican areas, but I dunno. Maybe. Rural Alabama is not my area of expertise.
I always thought of Butt Muscle, AL as more suburban than rural.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I guess I'd be surprised if the first place where girls HS sports suffers most is in southern rural Republican areas, but I dunno. Maybe. Rural Alabama is not my area of expertise.
Related to participatory equity in athletics? Or assault on campus? Both?
(I know you wrote "all" but that prompts me to ask "all of what.")
Related to what? Athletic participation?
Again, I understand the hive mind of this place insists on all-encompassing doom and destruction - one poster believes a civil war is coming in April, though it appears maybe it's been moved to the summer - but I strongly doubt any school is cutting women's sports without cutting the whole athletic department or many men's programs.
Investigate for what?
I always thought of Butt Muscle, AL as more suburban than rural.
I'm not aware of a President having the Constitutional authority to tell an athletics program, team, league or organization who they can and can't play in a competition.
I was focused primarily on participatory equity because the DOE was created and charged with enforcing Title IX not long after the deadline for schools to get into compliance, but we really haven't seen what Title IX would look like without the DOE.
At this point, culture at large is a much larger enforcer. It's hard to cut men's sports at major colleges. It is almost impossible to do so to women's sports, unless you're just ending the whole athletic department.