• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Verdict reached in Padilla trial

Point of Order said:
heyabbott said:
Quite Honestly, I don't give a shirt whether he got Due Process or Not. forkem, put a 40 cal slug in his ear and leave him on the side of the road. I haven't been overly impressed by how our Constitutional Protections have actually protected the citizens of this country lately.
To Quote Bob Herbert's latest column: "It has been almost six years since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when the nation's consciousness of terror was yanked to new heights. In those six years, nearly 100,000 people — an incredible number — have been murdered in the United States. No heightening of consciousness has accompanied this slaughter, which had nothing to do with terrorism. The news media and most politicians have hardly bothered to notice.

At the same time that we're diligently confiscating water and toothpaste from air travelers, we're handing over guns and bullets by the trainload to yahoos bent on blowing others into eternity in armed robberies, drug-dealing, gang violence, domestic assaults and other criminal acts."
Where's your due process now.

Yeah I do understand what I'm saying and I do get what happens if the protections aren't in place. But I don't get that the more the citizens are protected from the government, the less protected we are from each other and the less the government is able to do to protect us. You may pray every night that the man that rapes your child gets a wonderful and zealous attorney to represent him in court, I just want the government to prevent the rape or, at the very least, provide justice for all, not just the accused.

So fork Padilla in the ear with a jack hammer, with or with a trial, I don;t care much right now. Then lets move on to the 2 brutal animals in Connecticut for raping and killing a family. Gut them with a rusty knife without a trial will do more crime prevention than any month of criminal constitutional trials.

All well and good until someone tosses you behind bars and throws away the key.
Well, the thing is, I or a family member are more likely to be a victim of random violence and criminal behavior, than scooped up and tossed behind bars.

I don't believe that I'm well served by the current social compact.
 
digger said:
I'm really worried about this country and where we're heading. (and not just because of heyabbott. Add in people who say their main concern is national security, and think that the current president is doing a good job on it. The chances of anyone actually being hurt by a "terrorist'' here are probably 1 in say 20,000,000, but people are worried about the bogeyman because that's all the current administration can count on to keep people from realizing they've completely screwed everything up. And the fact that some people actually believe one of our political partys would be more willing to let terrorists come after us.)

I'm not sure where you get your numbers, but these bogeymen have been telling anyone who will listen that they want to kill us in large numbers, have succededonce on a arge scale, multiple times on smaller scales, and have been foiled more than that. But I think I'll choose the next commander in chief based on his position on carbon emissions.
 
OK Guy, fine.

But I'm willing to bet that in 2000, when ''terrorism'' wasn't an issue, you still thought the Democrats were totally wrong about something else that was your overriding issue. (abortion maybe, or maybe you're super-rich and taxes were a big concern). At least in that situation, Democrat or Republican actually matters.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top