I've been with Tribune, K-R and recently three years with Gannett. Not sure where all the Gannett hatred comes from in general. The one obvious thing for us has been mileage (hovers around .25). But their medical and 401K have been good for me and I haven't heard many complaints from others.
I travel on my beat and I've never had it scaled back, although the dept. one a whole has taken a hit with its travel budget.
The attention Gannett pays to getting diversity in the paper has its good and bad sides. What's wrong with appealing to everyone? What I don't like is purposely talking to someone because they are a minority. But it hasn't been made too big a deal here. You're asked to take a wide angle approach, but on deadline we all just end up doing what the story demands.
My stints with K-R and Tribune were about the same. Only noticeable thing was better mileage at my K-R stop.
Maybe the paper's circ. has a big part in whether it "appears" the company is good to work for. All of my stops were 100k or more with the exception of my first job at Tribune which was a 40K suburban (which is no longer a Trib property).
I travel on my beat and I've never had it scaled back, although the dept. one a whole has taken a hit with its travel budget.
The attention Gannett pays to getting diversity in the paper has its good and bad sides. What's wrong with appealing to everyone? What I don't like is purposely talking to someone because they are a minority. But it hasn't been made too big a deal here. You're asked to take a wide angle approach, but on deadline we all just end up doing what the story demands.
My stints with K-R and Tribune were about the same. Only noticeable thing was better mileage at my K-R stop.
Maybe the paper's circ. has a big part in whether it "appears" the company is good to work for. All of my stops were 100k or more with the exception of my first job at Tribune which was a 40K suburban (which is no longer a Trib property).