• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The NYT and The Athletic

see also,

It's OK not to have an opinion.

I'm more interested in, look, the NYT rescued The Athletic, which was not going to survive on its own, and the NYT's mild social media policy - "hey, could you not indict one specific political party as a sportswriter?" - is met with "eh, let's call the media police."

The point of the article is to apply pressure on the NYT to back down.
 
That seemed like the bigger story to me as well.

From talking to a few people I know there, the travel budget has been slashed significantly and is a much bigger deal to most who work there than the social media policy. They were kind of perturbed that the Defector piece only mentioned it in passing.
 
Half of the appeal of the place, that they have reporters everywhere the team goes, even if there isn't a story every day and focusing on quality not quantity, is out the window.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top