• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The NYT and The Athletic

I also think she's a good reporter. You don't stay on an NHL beat for a few years — especially with the turnover The Athletic's had — only because you are hot (insinuate even more if you'd like) and even if there's limited competition.

Would I do business that way? No, but I'm a fat old fart who never made anything of himself and sits here arm-chairing decisions made by people a helluva lot smarter and more successful than I am. My opinion means jack shirt, the same for about 95 percent of people who post at SJ. Something she does is working, whether you or I like it or not.
 
Last edited:
Also "made the Atheltic what it is today" means what? Made it something that was either unprofitable or so slight of profit that it had to be sold off to the NYT in order than NYT could now make whatever rules it wants?

"Had" is subjective. Tech bros cashed out at a good time, by the way.
 
I also think she's a good reporter. You don't stay on an NHL beat for a few years only — especially with the turnover The Athletic's had — because you are hot (insinuate even more if you'd like) and even if there's limited competition.

Would I do business that way? No, but I'm a fat old fart who never made anything of himself and sits here arm-chairing decisions made by people a helluva lot smarter and more successful than I am. My opinion means jack shirt, the same for about 95 percent of people who post at SJ. Something she does is working, whether you or I like it or not.
And it they fired her tomorrow, the outrage/martyrdom would last a couple of news cycles. The Athletic would scratch her name off the budget books, and either replace her from a talented pool of young journalists out there, or eliminate the position and move on. They would lose a few subscribers, maybe, but it wouldn't be cataclysmic.

No one is irreplaceable.
 
OK, not to sound like an ignoramus but does queer still mean gay? The rules change every week
 
"Had" is subjective. Tech bros cashed out at a good time, by the way.

they shopped it around and how many deals fell thru? They got rid of it before the bottom fell out and if these "we must Tweet freely" types were as valuable as they think they are that wouldn't have happened.

Lets not lose sight of the fact that these so-called draconian conditions aren't being imposed by Kendall Roy or Roger Ailles or Dave Portnoy. Its the NYT. They know how to run a railroad, fairly and inclusively.
 
I also think she's a good reporter. You don't stay on an NHL beat for a few years — especially with the turnover The Athletic's had — only because you are hot (insinuate even more if you'd like) and even if there's limited competition.

Would I do business that way? No, but I'm a fat old fart who never made anything of himself and sits here arm-chairing decisions made by people a helluva lot smarter and more successful than I am. My opinion means jack shirt, the same for about 95 percent of people who post at SJ. Something she does is working, whether you or I like it or not.
And if Ms. Civian made the money that Molly Knight did, she likely would have been gone a long time ago.
 
That girl is the absolute worst. Of course her statement was accompanied by a picture. A tweeting thirst trap disguised as a professional journalist.
What is a "tweeting thirst trap" or a "thirst trap"?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top