Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't think that is true. According to Wikipedia, that lawsuit was about Wiseguy and the was found to be too broad. I think the laws are written so that convicts automatically forfeit income as victim restitution, but are allowed to publish, therefore no prohibition on speech.For a time, "Son of Sam" laws, which prevented criminals from profiting off their crimes, were on the books. In 1991, SCOTUS unanimously tossed them.