waterytart
Well-Known Member
It's so obvious now he was meant to take over that it's a little boggling they stuck with the dual host thing as long as they did. Maybe that was because of contract provisions?
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was watching last night and I realized how perfect Ken is for that job. He wasn't a natural, but got on his feet pretty quickly. And he wasn't truly the guy following the guy, so that helped.
Alex never had the complete contempt for the contestants Sajak did (esp. towards the end of his run). Ken may be better than Alex because he is more relatable to contestants (having been one of them) and has greater authority over the game. Alex's authority came from his title and position, whereas Ken's comes from being the best to ever play.I've said this since Ken has started. I think he's better than Alex. He truly seems to enjoy what he's doing, he enjoys the history of the show, and his interactions with the contestants are way less awkward than Alex's. Ken is really good.
Alex cosplayed as a genius, whereas Ken is the real thing. Not saying Alex was a dumbass, but he was in the role long enough for the show to morph around him and his strengths.Alex never had the complete contempt for the contestants Sajak did (esp. towards the end of his run). Ken may be better than Alex because he is more relatable to contestants (having been one of them) and has greater authority over the game. Alex's authority came from his title and position, whereas Ken's comes from being the best to ever play.
And Alex could exaggerate the pronunciation of every French word he came across.
The Jeopardy equivalent of Carl Sagan's "Billions and Billions."