• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Clear Channel whacks a bunch of popular Cleveland radio personalities

Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Time for an AT&T-type forced breakup of the corporate media behemoths.

It serves local audiences nothing to have local stations all handed over to syndicated zombie programming.


I don't think it will make that much of a difference. There are locally-owned stations that take all their programming outside of morning and afternoon drive off the satellite. Technology makes it too easy to cut corners.

Require local programming.

How? What difference does it make if the person playing the Beyonce track is in town or 3,000 miles away?

It makes a LOT of difference. In the glory days of top-40 and early days of AOR radio, there were dramatic differences in regional music tastes -- and it's how different regional styles developed.

Plus, if the refinery a quarter mile down the street catches on fire, the local jock playing Beyonce can tell you about it sooner than the 48 hours it takes Zombie Sydnijock in LA to see it on CNN.


Different times. This isn't 1965 any more. There haven't been regional hits, a la the Top 40/early AOR days, in 30 years. There hasn't been a premium placed on being first on a record in a long time. Classic quote from a PD that I saw in one of the trades: "You never get hurt by the record you're <b>not</b> playing." It's a different mindset. If the refinery down the street catches fire, no one is depending on Z-88 to provide information, because Z-88 hasn't had local news in 20 years. Different times.
 
SoCalScribe said:
I don't think most Americans realize that TV and radio are encountering many of the same problems as newspapers -- perhaps because newspapers are so much more willing to eulogize themselves. We will see a lot less local radio and a lot less local TV newscasts in the near future.

I don't know what the current climate is like, but local news used to be a profit center for TV stations. That's why they have two and three-hour morning shows that contain 10 minutes worth of news and have gradually expanded the evening news to cover two or three hours.

Local radio news went away with deregulation. Most music-based FMs have someone reading headlines in the morning, otherwise nothing.
 
Smasher_Sloan said:
SoCalScribe said:
I don't think most Americans realize that TV and radio are encountering many of the same problems as newspapers -- perhaps because newspapers are so much more willing to eulogize themselves. We will see a lot less local radio and a lot less local TV newscasts in the near future.

I don't know what the current climate is like, but local news used to be a profit center for TV stations. That's why they have two and three-hour morning shows that contain 10 minutes worth of news and have gradually expanded the evening news to cover two or three hours.

Local radio news went away with deregulation. Most music-based FMs have someone reading headlines in the morning, otherwise nothing.

In a lot of small and mid-sized markets, it isn't uncommon for a Big 3 affiliate that hasn't had much ratings luck to chuck the news department altogether, or run a simulcast deal with another station in town. Jacksonville's the biggest one I can think of, but I'm sure there are plenty of others.
 
playthrough said:
Paul Daugherty in Cincy talked about his axing in his Enquirer blog. Worth a read. Part of it:

Paul and I went to HS together and were teammates on the wrestling team (him in the early matches, me toward the end, if not the end, if you get my drift ...)

I've run into him from time to time over the years and have always enjoyed shooting the breeze with him. Good guy. Better journalist. Like the way he writes.

He was really honest about the experience on his blog. Here's my favorite part:

"I'm 30 years into a writing career. Writing is a solitary act. It's sitting in front of a laptop in a home office, dog at your feet, trying in 700 words to make sense of the sports world. It is not yelling into a microphone about Dusty Baker's latest perceived screwup. Writing is rational. Radio, at least as defined locally, is biting the heads off live chickens."

Choke on those live chickens, and your own, you forking cocksuckers at Clear Channel.
 
Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Time for an AT&T-type forced breakup of the corporate media behemoths.

It serves local audiences nothing to have local stations all handed over to syndicated zombie programming.


I don't think it will make that much of a difference. There are locally-owned stations that take all their programming outside of morning and afternoon drive off the satellite. Technology makes it too easy to cut corners.

Require local programming.

How? What difference does it make if the person playing the Beyonce track is in town or 3,000 miles away?

It makes a LOT of difference. In the glory days of top-40 and early days of AOR radio, there were dramatic differences in regional music tastes -- and it's how different regional styles developed.

Plus, if the refinery a quarter mile down the street catches on fire, the local jock playing Beyonce can tell you about it sooner than the 48 hours it takes Zombie Sydnijock in LA to see it on CNN.

Or instead of a fire, a train derails and leaks anhydrous amonia putting people's lives in danger and no one is at the station.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minot_Train_Derailment
 
Brooklyn Bridge said:
Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Time for an AT&T-type forced breakup of the corporate media behemoths.

It serves local audiences nothing to have local stations all handed over to syndicated zombie programming.


I don't think it will make that much of a difference. There are locally-owned stations that take all their programming outside of morning and afternoon drive off the satellite. Technology makes it too easy to cut corners.

Require local programming.

How? What difference does it make if the person playing the Beyonce track is in town or 3,000 miles away?

It makes a LOT of difference. In the glory days of top-40 and early days of AOR radio, there were dramatic differences in regional music tastes -- and it's how different regional styles developed.

Plus, if the refinery a quarter mile down the street catches on fire, the local jock playing Beyonce can tell you about it sooner than the 48 hours it takes Zombie Sydnijock in LA to see it on CNN.

Or instead of a fire, a train derails and leaks anhydrous amonia putting people's lives in danger and no one is at the station.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minot_Train_Derailment

If someone is staffing those stations at 2:30 a.m. (which is pretty unlikely in places bigger than Minot), how exactly do they alert people who are sleeping? Do they call each citizen?
 
Hey Clear Channel, I have CDs in my car (c'mon, I have an old car). Next car, I'm going to have an iPod jack too. Suck on that!
 
I have a lot of respect for Paul Daugherty and his newspaper work, but is he saying he didn't know those truths about sports talk radio before he signed on to do a show?
 
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Smasher_Sloan said:
Starman said:
Time for an AT&T-type forced breakup of the corporate media behemoths.

It serves local audiences nothing to have local stations all handed over to syndicated zombie programming.


I don't think it will make that much of a difference. There are locally-owned stations that take all their programming outside of morning and afternoon drive off the satellite. Technology makes it too easy to cut corners.

Require local programming.

How? What difference does it make if the person playing the Beyonce track is in town or 3,000 miles away?

It makes a LOT of difference. In the glory days of top-40 and early days of AOR radio, there were dramatic differences in regional music tastes -- and it's how different regional styles developed.

Plus, if the refinery a quarter mile down the street catches on fire, the local jock playing Beyonce can tell you about it sooner than the 48 hours it takes Zombie Sydnijock in LA to see it on CNN.


Different times. This isn't 1965 any more. There haven't been regional hits, a la the Top 40/early AOR days, in 30 years. There hasn't been a premium placed on being first on a record in a long time. Classic quote from a PD that I saw in one of the trades: "You never get hurt by the record you're <b>not</b> playing." It's a different mindset. If the refinery down the street catches fire, no one is depending on Z-88 to provide information, because Z-88 hasn't had local news in 20 years. Different times.

Yeah. Another triumph of the Reaganauts.

Thanks to their mania for deregulation, you can now turn on your radio at pretty much any location in the contiguous 48 states, and hear the same three or four stations. Woo hoo.
 
All the Detroit clear channel stations have new DJs this week. Ones who work four hour shifts. You know what that means - 20 hour weeks. No insurance, or other benefits, less pay. shirtty.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top