• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Going paywall...

Buy some beer for whoever answers the phone, handles social media, deals with public, etc.
 
Yeah...this is why papers should have been on board with this from Day 1...not decades after the fact.
Just saw a post the other day on Twitter about Netflix
"I like your content, I access it all the time, but how dare you expect me to pay $11 a month for the service"
Same with newspapers, why people just expect us to be there is beyond me.
If you value local news be willing to support it ... and yes, that means financially. Our subscription rate is far from breaking the bank.
 
I'm heading out of vacation and due back the day after the paywall goes up, sounds like I should expect full inboxes :)
 
Yeah...this is why papers should have been on board with this from Day 1...not decades after the fact.
Just saw a post the other day on Twitter about Netflix
"I like your content, I access it all the time, but how dare you expect me to pay $11 a month for the service"
Same with newspapers, why people just expect us to be there is beyond me.
If you value local news be willing to support it ... and yes, that means financially. Our subscription rate is far from breaking the bank.
What bothers me the most about all the whining is that the cost of a subscription is dirt cheap. If it's important to people, they should pay the measly $10-20/month. If it isn't, they should just STHU.
 
We're twice a week ($45 for print/digital or $35 for digital-only) per year. So yeah, you are getting digital access for the cost of a cheap Starbucks each month.
 
I hope it's a timed or full paywall.

Metered paywalls are the least effective and most cumbersome to deal with. For one, they're easy to get around via adblockers, private browsing, and other methods. Two, they often simply don't work.

A timed paywall is nice because everyone can read an article when it first goes up, but if it's been up for more than a day, or a week, or whatever the timer is, it goes behind a paywall that can't be worked around.

The most effective is a full paywall, like The Athletic, but it's hard to commit to that switch and it's hard to grab a new audience without making some content free as a teaser.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top