YankeeFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Messages
- 55,039
The Times-Tribune doesn't appreciate being mentioned in David Carr's NY Times article (separate thread):
Lawrence K. Beaupre -- @LarryBeaupre
Hey, @carr2n, still wondering why you took a swipe at @timestribune w/o bothering to understand story. @nytimes http://ow.ly/c5YmY
Hey, @carr2n, here's the original @timestribune story you took a swipe at. What exactly did WE do wrong? http://ow.ly/c6E0J
Hey, @Carr2n, why is this an example of a "crack" in journalism? Here are the facts: http://ow.ly/c6Eem @nytimes @sportstt
I'm not sure what he doesn't understand.
They printed something fake. They turned over a portion of their paper to someone they allegedly "cover", but did nothing to verify the information.
It's a recipe for getting burned. Take the risk if you want to, but you shouldn't be surprised when you get burned.
Lawrence K. Beaupre -- @LarryBeaupre
Hey, @carr2n, still wondering why you took a swipe at @timestribune w/o bothering to understand story. @nytimes http://ow.ly/c5YmY
Hey, @carr2n, here's the original @timestribune story you took a swipe at. What exactly did WE do wrong? http://ow.ly/c6E0J
Hey, @Carr2n, why is this an example of a "crack" in journalism? Here are the facts: http://ow.ly/c6Eem @nytimes @sportstt
I'm not sure what he doesn't understand.
They printed something fake. They turned over a portion of their paper to someone they allegedly "cover", but did nothing to verify the information.
It's a recipe for getting burned. Take the risk if you want to, but you shouldn't be surprised when you get burned.