2muchcoffeeman
Well-Known Member
Hamas is an acronym for Ḥarakah al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah, not a word. It roughly translates as "Islamic Resistance Movement," but "the Hamas" is grammatically incorrect.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hamas is an acronym for Ḥarakah al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah, not a word. It roughly translates as "Islamic Resistance Movement," but "the Hamas" is grammatically incorrect.
I'm good with that, but once the Israelis clean up the breakouts in short order, it will became a Gaza slaughter. The proverbial fish in a very dense barrel.Since this is pretty much a cinch to become the Israeli war thread, may we update the thread title accordingly?
It's the National Aeronautics and Space Administration but you wouldn't call it the NASA
NERDS!Hamas is an acronym for Ḥarakah al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah, not a word. It roughly translates as "Islamic Resistance Movement," but "the Hamas" is grammatically incorrect.
I hear you. My son (now a freshman in college) has been to Israel twice in the last two years - once for a six-week visit sponsored by his summer camp and again last spring for four weeks with his senior clash (he transferred to a Jewish prep school after freshman year because he needed smaller clashes and more attention than our huge public HS could give and the Israel trip is part of the curriculum). Yesterday he learned that one of his Israeli counselors from his visit this past spring, who he was close to, was abducted by Hamas from a desert rave shortly after the start of the attack and then there was a published report yesterday evening that he was murdered (we are holding out hope it is false - the news source has a sketchy quality - but realistically he's probably dead). I spent a year there myself when I was younger and was there during a scary time myself (the first Gulf War - I was there for the scuds). I have friends I've known for more than 30 years who live there and some of them have kids doing their active duty commitment in the IDF. I don't blame anyone for engaging in debate over short/long term blame, Bibi's political future, US support for Israel, etc, but it's just tough to digest that kind of armchair analysis right now (the same way it's probably tough to hear armchair analysis from me when a world event takes place that I have zero connection to, I'm personally removed from and it's largely academic). I'm feeling pretty dazed regarding yesterday. And I'm dreading the decision we're going to have to make regarding whether our daughter goes this summer knowing how crushed she'll be if she can't go - the trip is a culmination of an 8-year program - and how emotionally wrenching it will be to have to make a decision not to send our daughter to visit what to us is our homeland and a refuge for our people, as imperfect as it may be. They canceled the trip for covid a few years ago but they've never, in something like 75 years, canceled it for geopolitical/safety issues.
Doubt is a strong word. No, I don't doubt it. I also don't think it's 100% metaphysical certitude, given Israel in this hypothetical scenario still presumably has the US as an ally. Because I do think we'd go to war for them in that hypothetical scenario and probably end up with some hard-earned stalemate that'd would basically put everyone where they already are now, minus tens of thousands of dead on all sides.
I don't see a solution to this problem that would make both sides happy or even content.
Let me add, for TigerVols' friend, if Israel were truly only about peace, why are they settling the West Bank over and over and over again? I suspect the average hard-liner has just as much hate in his heart as your average aggrieved Palestinian.
Edit: I looked at my wording and it could be confusing. TLDR: They'd 100% be attacked. I don't think they'd be wiped out.