Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
All those old white presidents look alike
OK, I'm living in the past. But my graduate polling clash from 40 years ago cast doubt on opt-in methods. Apparently that hasn't changed too much.They don't.
Oh, I'm well aware it could happen again. To me this feels a bit more like 2012 or 2020. But I absolutely could be wrong. (Numbers were very similar in 2012 at this stage, though it feels like a different universe).Just replace Stein with "other." Same difference.
Trump won with 46.1% of the vote in 2016. He lost with 46.8% of the vote in 2020.
Found it funny that the "potential ashashin" in Coachella was just a gun nut for Trump.
I'd love to hear Trump be asked "What lessons did you take from your first term that would make for a better second term?" Just to give him a chance to show that he is capable of learning.
Roe-inspired voters are no more or less likely to avoid calls from unidentified numbers than anybody else. That's my first instinct. Only thing is that women of reproductive age don't have land lines. Old people do in some cases. But that shouldn't make that big a difference.I see this time and again and have to wonder.
What magical force would be causing pollsters to always miss voters who care about Roe?
Just sounds like wishful thinking without any basis in logic.