• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pujols' trainer and Deadspin

Doesn't Albert, while on th DL, show up at the ball park for treatment or something? Doesn't some reporter/beat guy have to at least ask about Mihlfeld's name coming up in this mess?
Even if it's a no comment, or "I don't know anything about that," don't you at least have to ask? And isn't Albert's response of innoncence/ignorance in relation to Mihlfeld then at least worth a notebook lead?
 
spnited said:
Doesn't Albert, while on th DL, show up at the ball park for treatment or something? Doesn't some reporter/beat guy have to at least ask about Mihlfeld's name coming up in this mess?
Even if it's a no comment, or "I don't know anything about that," don't you at least have to ask? And isn't Albert's response of innoncence/ignorance in relation to Mihlfeld then at least worth a notebook lead?

Dont know about question No. 1, but the subsequent answers are yes, yes and yes. If you're covering the team, there's a tactful, professional way to broach the subject. Ignoring it would not seem to be a particularly intelligent option.
 
I think the Cardinal beat guys are too busy writing features on Tony LaRussa adopting stray puppies.
 
Armchair_QB said:
I think the Cardinal beat guys are too busy writing features on Tony LaRussa adopting stray puppies.

Wasn't that Bobby Cox? Or did I miss something with LaRussa's love for pups?
 
Orange Hat Bobcat said:
Armchair_QB said:
I think the Cardinal beat guys are too busy writing features on Tony LaRussa adopting stray puppies.

Wasn't that Bobby Cox? Or did I miss something with LaRussa's love for pups?

Bobby Cox is the one beating his wife.
 
I guess we're all a little misleading.

The major jump, from my perspective was from that year in the mid-minors to the massive jump to being a rookie in MLB.

I do like your stat re: he longest stop that year.

He had 17 HRs in 395 at-bats.

As a rookie in the majors, he had 37 HRs in 590 at-bats (weird aside ... until this season, Pujols' minimum ABs in a season: 590. Maximum? 592).

Let's get him to the 34 HRs you mentioned in his second year in the majors, if you wish.

That would be 34 HRs in 790 ABs in AA.

He hit three more HRs as a rookie in the majors in 200 FEWER at-bats? Or, using the preference in your post, the same number of homers in those 200 fewer ABs (still... the rookie transition is the jaw-dropping one... so I think we should stick with that.)

I wasn't referring to the home runs, but more the slugging percentage, which was similar.

If you wanted to make a leap to the juice, I guess you could look at the doubles which he turned into homers, but I wasn't going there.

Don't know what he's taking, if anything. But I did see him regularly in Cards' training camp that spring when he made the team.
It was pretty clear he was ready. The Cardinals kept trying to find reasons why he wouldn't make the jump to the bigs, and he kept answering every question.

In another era, I guess we could posit that there are just some players who are just ready that young. Maybe he could have jumped straight to the bigs. It happens, although in those rare instances, the players usually went to college first.
Guerrero was 20 when be broke in, wasn't he? He did have some minor-league time. But he also had a lot of catching up to do when he arrived in the U.S. from the Dominican, while it was clear that Pujols had the best of the best as he was groomed for greatness.

All of which to say, I'm a little stumped on this one. But I do want to believe.
 
flaming_mo said:
Deadspin is back-tracking faster than you can say "bullshirt."

http://www.deadspin.com/sports/baseball/kc-trainer-responds-denies-affidavit-cameo-179686.php

By the way, we feel obliged to — once again — clarify our initial report. A few facts:

• There is no claim that Albert Pujols has taken HGH.
• There is no claim that Mihlfeld was in any way a distributor of HGH, or steroids.
• There is a source — whose confidence has always been rated at “80 percent” — who says Mihlfeld's name is in the report. Mihlfeld has denied this, and we, as always, hope he's right. As anyone who has ever read this site knows, Albert Pujols is our favorite player. We own four different pieces of merchandise with his name on it. We are out to get no one, least of all him.

Wahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
 
spinning27 said:
flaming_mo said:
Deadspin is back-tracking faster than you can say "bullshirt."

I wouldn't exactly call that backtracking.

No, that isn't backtracking. Backtracking would at least mean trying to save face.
 
flaming_mo said:
spinning27 said:
flaming_mo said:
Deadspin is back-tracking faster than you can say "bullshirt."

I wouldn't exactly call that backtracking.

They're now only "80 percent" confident in their source. That's not exactly a bold defense of their original report.

There is a connection between Grimsley and this trainer. There is a connection between this trainer and Pujols. Whether or not the guy is actually on the list, that's a heck of a lot more reporting on the issue than the P-D and Mr. "What's there to look into" Hummel have ever done.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top