Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Simon_Cowbell said:... whatever the reason.BYH said:Simon_Cowbell said:Tuck was definitely the first-half MVP.Rumpleforeskin said:The fourth quarter won Eli that MVP. He shouldn't have been it. I think it should have gone to Tuck.
Problem is this.... the defense totally spit the bit in crunch time.
Or...they were just forkin gassed from carrying the load for 3 1/2 quarters.
The Giants offense had the ball for the first 10 minutes, too.
Really? Because Wade's done it before. See: Bills-Pats, "Just give it to 'em," Foxborough, 1998.Yawn said:Monday Morning Sportswriter said:SockPuppet said:Yeah, fine, but the game wasn't over.
Agreed, but the refs shouldn't have started the clock, as if to indicate it was.
I didn't watch Belichick's eyes, but I'm pretty sure he wasn't looking up at the scoreboard to see if the clock was running after he and Coughlin hugged.
I imagine they'll talk about this on PTI tomorrow, Tony will say it was no big deal, and that'll be the end of it.
Had it been Wade Phillips or Tony Dungy, it wouldn't have gotten but one post here and certainly no Monday morning shirt.
writing irish said:Sorry, Pats deserved to lose, and lost. Whether or not they should have kicked a long-range field goal pales in relation to the fact that they sucked ass. No way should this game have come down to a NE 48-yard FG attempt.
Batman said:hockeybeat said:Pats never adjusted to the Jints' blitz. Not once.Simon_Cowbell said:They really don't...93Devil said:heyabbott said:Greatest Defensive Performance in Super Bowl history
The Bears, Steelers and Ravens have something to say, but they are willing to listen.
Pats scoring 14 points in a dome is beyond comprehension.
I was thinking the same thing about the blitz. I remember, while watching the Indy game, noticing how the Pats were absolutely killing a good Colts rush with screens and draws to Faulk. Off the top of my head, I remember seeing one screen tonight (that was knocked down by Strahan) -- and even that was more of a swing pass than a true screen -- and no draws. Way to make adjustments there, Hoodie.
Simon_Cowbell said:Huh?writing irish said:The FG call shouldn't even be an issue. Pats sucked dong and deserved to lose.
An NFL team, in this day and age, not having a guy they feel confident giving a 49-yarder to ... indoors.... that's inconceivable.
Ernie Accorsi, for one.nafselon said:Eli Manning...who would've thunk it?
mustardbased said:Sorry if this has been touched on, but is this right?
The four highest scoring teams in NFL history all have one thing in common: No Super Bowl championship.
589 New England, 2007
556 Minnesota, 1998
541 Washington, 1983
540 St. Louis, 2000
They did run some successful inside draws. One was called back on a silly hold from Watson. But all the props to the Big Blue defense. It was a near-perfect performance.hockeybeat said:You're absolutely right. No screens. No draws. Not keeping a back in the chip block. And Brady was running for his life on seemingly every play.Batman said:hockeybeat said:Pats never adjusted to the Jints' blitz. Not once.Simon_Cowbell said:They really don't...93Devil said:heyabbott said:Greatest Defensive Performance in Super Bowl history
The Bears, Steelers and Ravens have something to say, but they are willing to listen.
Pats scoring 14 points in a dome is beyond comprehension.
I was thinking the same thing about the blitz. I remember, while watching the Indy game, noticing how the Pats were absolutely killing a good Colts rush with screens and draws to Faulk. Off the top of my head, I remember seeing one screen tonight (that was knocked down by Strahan) -- and even that was more of a swing pass than a true screen -- and no draws. Way to make adjustments there, Hoodie.
What argument?HandsomeHarley said:Simon_Cowbell said:Huh?writing irish said:The FG call shouldn't even be an issue. Pats sucked dong and deserved to lose.
An NFL team, in this day and age, not having a guy they feel confident giving a 49-yarder to ... indoors.... that's inconceivable.
I could see an argument if it were Tynes, but no. They should have kicked the FG.