Bodie_Broadus
Active Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
- Messages
- 3,576
sgreenwell said:Bodie_Broadus said:sgreenwell said:I'm guessing things have slowed down a bit in this thread because we're busy in our respective NCAA 14 threads now. I've had a chance to play it a week or so now, and love the way they re-did the recruiting - much less of a time sink and just more accurate in general now, it seems. The gameplay changes, I can't really tell what they've changed - Some plays seem more effective, and some plays less. I also like the Ultimate Team thing, although I see it as more of something I'll occasionally dabble in when I'm not doing Dynasty stuff.
One option or gameplay mode I wish they would add - Streamlined playing. Meaning, a game option with no replays, no commentary, no running ticker on the bottom of the screen, and none of the presentation stuff. I realize that some of that stuff is in now in order to hide when the game is loading, but I'd honestly rather see a loading icon for a second or two. Just me, or everyone - I normally am tapping X constantly between plays and skipping every sort of presentation thing. I could careless about the "realistic" aspects they throw into the game.
Non-NCAA games, I got my computer back so I've played a couple Civ5 games. Because I have ADD when it comes to games, I'll play a couple turns of that while waiting for NCAA to finish loading / simming. Great stuff. It plays so different from Civ4 that I'm still getting used to things. To those of you with more experience in the game, how far apart should I space cities...? In past games, your "city grid" was always a 5-by-5 grid with the corners cut out, but in this one with the switch to hexes, I can't tell. It's resulted in me inadvertently starting cities that are too far to ever connect to my capital, or so close that they're running into resource problems. I do like though that in general, it's easier to win with a smaller empire as opposed to previous editions, since all of the Wonders you can build have reduced costs.
The recruiting on NCAA is so frustrating but I kinda like that. I won the NC in my second year, Washington Huskies, and I have yet to get a five-star player. I have lost one game in the Pac-12 in two years, Stanford, and am usually 3rd or 4th in the conference in recruiting.
On the old versions, I'd be top 3 in the nation every year after one NC.
It definitely "feels" more realistic in this regard, yeah. I won the NC as Old Dominion in a first-year dynasty, to get that trophy, and only about five 4-star guys were interested in me the next year. I think program prestige gain is capped at one star per year, which is probably part of it. Even with the real-life runs of Boise State, it's not like they've been awash in 5-star recruits since then, so that makes sense.
I have four five-star WR's interested this season, I am chasing two the other two are gonna pick someone else.