• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"said Podunk coach Joe Jones" vs. "Podunk coach Joe Jones said"

Also, funny anecdote: Once read in a paper (might have been the Hartford Courant) the following:

"I have no explanation," coach Frank Jones explained.
 
For a second I thought you were going to tell him to use "exclaimed" or "opined" instead and I was going to cut you in your face.

One of our local papers has done that for as long as I can remember. "Said" for the first quote, and a different word for every one after that. Stated. Recalled. Related. Admitted. Lamented. Pointed out. Continued. Emphasized. (Those were all in the same story!)
But they've hired two younger guys in the last year who actually know how to write, so I have some hope for their future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ace
I've done the same thing as with Ace's example.

We're always taught to write in active voice. I've always thought "xxxx said" is written in active voice, and "said xxxx" is pashive.
The active/pashive differentiation cited isn't correct.

Active: subject is active in executing the verb (He did something.)
Pashive: what would have been the subject in an active voice is replaced by what would have been the object of the verb (Something was done by him.)

Active is in almost every case more effective, lively, powerful. Among the exceptions are certain idioms. "We wuz robbed" kills it; "The refs robbed us of the game" falls short.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top