Bubbler
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 25,625
My bad. I apologize. Now I am confusing myself, though. I know the Phil Spector version, and I know the George Martin version. So you are saying you prefer the Phil Spector version? My sense was always that more people preferred George Martin's version; didn't like what Phil Spector did to it.
Yes, I prefer the Spector version. And you're right, many prefer the single version mixed by George Martin, which is the muted one in which George Harrison's solo is played through a Hammond organ Leslie speaker.
Starman nailed most of the history behind it, but what I didn't know until I did a bit of research of my own is that the harder solo was recorded in early 1970 when Spector began piecing the Get Back sessions together.
By then, George Harrison had heard the final mix of what was to be the "Let It Be" single and thought his solo could be better. He wanted something with more heft. Hence the difference in the guitar solo in the single version vs. the album version.
Then, there's George's original, recorded live during the Get Back sessions. And there's a third used on the Naked album.
I always wondered what it would sound like if both the single and album solos were superimposed on top of one another? Figured it would be the dream version of the song.
Well, it's kind of a case of being careful what you wish for. Inevitably, someone mashed them up on Youtube. Here's the result.
A mess because without access to the masters, you can't balance them correctly.
Anyway, I think the Spector version of the "Let It Be" album is a tad unfairly maligned. And I like Harrison's solo in the album version not necessarily because it's harder, but because it creates a sonic sweep that the single version lacks. The loud moments give poignancy to the quiet ones.