I Should Coco
Well-Known Member
I stand corrected ... thanks in large part to Rutgers, Indiana and Maryland being awful for most of the past decade, the Big Ten Worst, er ... West, hasn't done as badly against the East as I thought.I'm going to do a little digging later today or tomorrow on the B1G West's record vs. the East teams since the two divisions were established. I'd be shocked if the West has won more than one-third of those matchups.
So far this season they've won zero, although Iowa might (and I stress MIGHT) have a chance to break that streak later today.
The lame Legends and Leaders divisions lasted only three years, 2011-13, during which time Wisconsin won two Big Ten Championship games (out of the "Leaders" division). In the nine seasons since, the East has swept the championship games, usually by a large margin, over the Badgers, Iowa, Northwestern and Purdue.
But in the regular season, the winning percentage of the B1G East is not that lopsided. According to this count by a Penn State football website, the B1G East only enjoyed a 77-70 edge over in head-to-head games over the past eight seasons of geography-based divisions (.524 winning percentage) – an average of about one more win per season since the conference switched from the Legend-Leaders format to East-West in 2014.
I will update this after looking at the 2022 season. And again, the East has won all the games so far this season.
UPDATE: The B1G East went 13-8 vs. the West in 2022 regular season games. So that makes the total since 2014 (nine seasons) Big Ten East 90, Big Ten West 78 (a ,536 winning percentage). Still far short of the .667 winning percentage I predicted.
If we add this year (assuming Michigan doesn't choke up a 38-0 lead at Nebraska), the B1G East is 5-0 ... making the total 95-78 heading into tonight's Michigan State at Iowa game. So the up-to-date winning percentage for the Big Ten East is .550.
Last edited: