Azrael
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2010
- Messages
- 28,883
I want universal health care.
I want a very different kind of policing system, starting with the end of using police departments and nickel and dime laws as funding vehicles for the city government.
I think the wealth gap is real and a serious problem.
But I tend to reject more globalism than most, yes. COVID is a compelling argument against the dangers of it, as is global warming brought about by a global economy where goods can't be shipped by zero emissions boats. I reject the decadence we've settled into through our reliance on the cheap wages of other nations.
Powerful, wealthy, culturally urbane or whatever people tend to love globalism, because the world is a canvas on which they can write a commentary that fits nicely in their wondrous life portfolio. We have a class of Americans so divorced from being impacted by...really anything practical...that rank and file struggles either become a rounding error on a data sheet or some faceless, amoral opposition to idealized life.
You know who depends on "globalism"?
American soy bean farmers. And Wal-Mart shoppers.
But that's not really what's under discussion on this thread. What's being examined here is American standing in the world. Our national stature in the community of nations. Our global political leverage.
Some of which depends on military power certainly, and money, but a great deal of which rests on our reputation in the world.
You want to isolate China and China's rapacious combination of runaway capitalism and murderous authoritarianism?
You better hope the United States can build a global coalition of allies willing to do so. A failure of our international standing makes that much harder to do.
The rest of what you posted could be cribbed from an anti-League of Nations flyer circa 1920. Decadent Europe! Hedonists! Bankers! Immoral urbanites!