• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mike Reed Sets Goals for New Gannett

They switched all their biggest sites to an upgraded version of their CMS and, predictably, it crashed.
 
I guess there's a Gannett "lunch out" today where newsroom employees aren't working from 1 p.m.-2 p.m.

Does this really do anything other than make the employees feel like they are doing something worthy? Will Gannett care and/or this have any effect on what's going on there?

This might come off as sarcastic but actually curious. Yes, I don't think it means squat but that doesn't mean I'm right and wondering for other perspectives (if there are any).
 
Well, since cuts have already started I'm guessing corporate isn't really paying attention.
 
I guess there's a Gannett "lunch out" today where newsroom employees aren't working from 1 p.m.-2 p.m.

Does this really do anything other than make the employees feel like they are doing something worthy? Will Gannett care and/or this have any effect on what's going on there?

This might come off as sarcastic but actually curious. Yes, I don't think it means squat but that doesn't mean I'm right and wondering for other perspectives (if there are any).
I can't imagine that taking a lunch break and tweeting about it will accomplish anything.
 
I guess there's a Gannett "lunch out" today where newsroom employees aren't working from 1 p.m.-2 p.m.

Does this really do anything other than make the employees feel like they are doing something worthy? Will Gannett care and/or this have any effect on what's going on there?

This might come off as sarcastic but actually curious. Yes, I don't think it means squat but that doesn't mean I'm right and wondering for other perspectives (if there are any).

As someone who participated in today's lunch break, I don't think there is an illusion that these acts are supposed to "accomplish anything" of significance. But they do publicize issues, show strength in numbers and prove the ability to rally the troops. Does Gannett care about that? Who knows. Maybe (probably) not. However, I do think it is better to show a somewhat collective voice than to just silently let the company keep doing its thing.
 
Hearing at least one from my former shop (and there aren't many left) has been told he needs to be at a noon meeting on Friday.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top