• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
And of course the first question in today's newser with the Polish president goes to One America News.
 
It's not evidence the attack took place. It's evidence she SAID the attack took place long before Trump was President, let alone after Kavenaugh was nominated. These witnesses refute the idea Ford's accusation has political motivation. It doesn't
refute the possibility she's mistaken as to the identity of her attacker nor that she's just plain delusional. Judge is the only witness we know of who can speak to the incident itself. Since Kavenaugh's position is that it didn't happen, it's at least odd the Republicans don't want to call Judge as a witness.
All the therapist, husband and friends know about the incident is what she told them. After all the times the media has called Trump on spouting out his own version of stuff ("Without evidence, President Donald Trump today tweeted that the black unemployment rate ...") I wonder why Ms. Ball's version of something that happened 35 years ago is being accepted as stone, cold fact.
 
All the therapist, husband and friends know about the incident is what she told them. After all the times the media has called Trump on spouting out his own version of stuff ("Without evidence, President Donald Trump today tweeted that the black unemployment rate ...") I wonder why Ms. Ball's version of something that happened 35 years ago is being accepted as stone, cold fact.


I don't think we should accept her "version" as a stone cold lock. But what would her motivation be 6 years ago before 99.9% of the country had ever heard of Kavenaugh? If your house was on the line would you bet that she was telling the truth or that he was telling the truth. I understand that legally this tells us nothing but if you were a betting man where would you place your wager?
 
Yup.
This newser was a waste of time. Nothing but batting practice fast balls. Called only on his BFFs.
Staff it will a pool reporter for the legitimate news services. And don't broadcast Huckster or tweet print or quote her unless it's verfied.

Only verified news from the WH should be reported
 
All the therapist, husband and friends know about the incident is what she told them. After all the times the media has called Trump on spouting out his own version of stuff ("Without evidence, President Donald Trump today tweeted that the black unemployment rate ...") I wonder why Ms. Ball's version of something that happened 35 years ago is being accepted as stone, cold fact.
What was her motive for this in 2012?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top