Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
sportschick said:Flying Headbutt said:I don't see why Purdue or Michigan State are in. Drexel and Cuse can and should have gone in over them. Otherwise, I'm fine with everything.
And I have Georgia Tech going to the Sweet 16. The ACC was represented just right this year. So was the Pac 10.
And Billy Packer is the happiest man in America because he's a giant ash.
Purdue lost to Indiana State. That's all I'm saying about it.
Gutter said:sportschick said:Flying Headbutt said:I don't see why Purdue or Michigan State are in. Drexel and Cuse can and should have gone in over them. Otherwise, I'm fine with everything.
And I have Georgia Tech going to the Sweet 16. The ACC was represented just right this year. So was the Pac 10.
And Billy Packer is the happiest man in America because he's a giant ash.
Purdue lost to Indiana State. That's all I'm saying about it.
So did Butler.
jagtrader said:Drexel is a 3 seed in the NIT. Now everyone should be happy.
How did they get ship on last year? The ACC deserved four, it got four.mustardbased said:Here's the thing about the ACC this year, though ... I'm still not convinced it isn't being wildly overrated. Maybe it's a fuction of traditional teams shipting the bed, but your tournament byes were earned by UNC, UVa, VT and BC. Feels like a down year, but RPI says otherwise.
Of course, if you think the ACC was going to get ship on AGAIN after last year ...